Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Stefan Kost
Shaun McCance schrieb: Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507336 Does anyone know what a fix would be? What are the rules for POSIX variable name? Most hits

Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, à 16:21 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : It seems to me that, if we just require GNU make, we ought to just pass -Wno-portability to automake. Makes sense to me. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___

Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:27 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote: Shaun McCance schrieb: Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507336 Does anyone know what a fix

Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Shaun McCance wrote: On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:27 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote: Shaun McCance schrieb: Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils:

gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-15 Thread Shaun McCance
Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507336 Discussions on IRC indicate that we pretty much require GNU make all over the place in Gnome, including for intltool.