Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-07 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
P� Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Vincent Untz skrev: We should fix the modules without MAINTAINERS file to have one. Do you have a list of such modules? First shot: | jhbuild libxslt intltool scrollkeeper-0.3.14 glib fontconfig Render | Xrender cairo Xft pango atk gtk+ gconf

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-06 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: Maybe we want a desktop-devel-patches@ list? Regardless of where the canonical place to store patches is (mailing list archive or Bugzilla), I think it is valuable to make it easy for groups of interested people to review incoming patches,

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-06 Thread Marc O'Morain
On 06/10/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably just need a Bugzilla hack where if a patch is attached to a bug (or an existing one is updated) it gets autosent to some mailing list. Digging about it's kind of like this: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/patch-diligence-report.cgi

More general patch notification? [Was: Re: gnome-utils patch]

2005-10-06 Thread Elijah Newren
On 10/6/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: Maybe we want a desktop-devel-patches@ list? Regardless of where the canonical place to store patches is (mailing list archive or Bugzilla), I think it is valuable to make it easy for

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-05 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 05 octobre 2005 à 00:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit : yes, you are right. Maybe each project should have their own lists for this sort of things? In fact, some modules in GNOME CVS have no MAINTAINERS file, so it is very difficult to find out who are those maintainers, and thus the

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-05 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 08:58 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mercredi 05 octobre 2005 à 00:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit : yes, you are right. Maybe each project should have their own lists for this sort of things? In fact, some modules in GNOME CVS have no MAINTAINERS file, so it is very

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Elijah Newren
On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit? Is bugzilla not working? ;-) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit? Is bugzilla not working? ;-) I guess it is, but usually it is

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:30 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit?

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 23:35 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:30 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf,