On 2012-09-09, at 2:35 AM, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Colin,
can you give me a concrete example of some output where the silent switch is
actually problematic? For every occasion where I have used it so far, it only
removed lines which look like
make[2]: Leaving directory
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2012 à 20:48 -0700, Maciej Piechotka a écrit :
In any case - people who care the most would be the one who have the
most knowledge to just change it locally (say use -s flag).
What about alias make=make -s V=0 ?
___
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote:
can you give me a concrete example of some output where the silent switch is
actually problematic? For every occasion where I have used it so far, it
only removed lines which look like
make[2]: Leaving directory
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:06 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to hear some opinions about why the -s (--silent) option of
make is not being used more often in projects? I just updated the
configure.ac and Makefile.am files of a project I was working on and I
made these two
Hi All,
I would like to hear some opinions about why the -s (--silent) option of
make is not being used more often in projects? I just updated the
configure.ac and Makefile.am files of a project I was working on and I
made these two changes:
configure.ac:
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:06 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
I tried to ask in #gtk+ why they are using the SILENT_RULES makro, but
are not using the silent make flag, and someone tried to explain to me,
that this also silences warnings, but as can be seen below, it does not.
I also dont see a real
Hi Colin,
can you give me a concrete example of some output where the silent
switch is actually problematic? For every occasion where I have used it
so far, it only removed lines which look like
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/Documents/Code/tilda'
and I don't understand how that can
