On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 08:52 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:12 +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> > One more question:
> >
> > The sample autogen.sh on https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommo
> > n/
> > Migration also explicitly calls aclocal like this:
> >
>
Looks fine to me, thanks.
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:14 +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> I have just updated the wiki, please let me know if something I
> changed
> is not right:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration
>
>
> On 09/02/17 15:03, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:14:13PM +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> I have just updated the wiki, please let me know if something I changed
> is not right:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration
This is probably bikeshedding, but it's easier to remove lines than
I have just updated the wiki, please let me know if something I changed
is not right:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration
On 09/02/17 15:03, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 9 February 2017 at 13:57, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
>> What confuses me is that this
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:12 +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> One more question:
>
> The sample autogen.sh on https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/
> Migration also explicitly calls aclocal like this:
>
> aclocal --install || exit 1
>
> But the man page for autoreconf says that
On 9 February 2017 at 13:57, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> What confuses me is that this paragraph starts with the phrase "it does
> not need any modifications made".
>
>> It does not need any modifications made, unless you need to run
>> another tool before configure, or do
What confuses me is that this paragraph starts with the phrase "it does
not need any modifications made".
> It does not need any modifications made, unless you need to run
> another tool before configure, or do not use one of glib-gettextize,
> gtkdocize or intltoolize. (Note that you should not
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 10:32 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Hi;
>
> On 9 February 2017 at 09:56, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) t> wrote:
>
> > It would be great to have an additional entry on this
> > page that is maybe named "build automation" or "building the
> > application" and