[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-20 Thread Che Kristo
Well said Alan, bookmarked as "the final word" for when the next person brings up this Fluendo codec thing :-) On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > david wrote: > > If there is a man eater shark off the coast what do the local officials > do? > > They don't mail here, beca

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-17 Thread Alan Coopersmith
david wrote: > If there is a man eater shark off the coast what do the local officials do? They don't mail here, because that would be pointless. This worldwide list of people developing and using OpenSolaris desktop software is the wrong place to deal with the problem - it would be filling the

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-16 Thread david
The very reason I have not purchased the Fluendo codecs is because the full pack list Microsoft media formats. If it was just codecs for other stuff that would definitely not send money to Micorsoft, then I might buy them just for the convenience of it. I have a basic aversion to being a hypoc

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-16 Thread david
"I am no fan of Microsoft myself, but I am curious as to why you choose to use Microsoft's throw away email account service, hotmail.com, and then proceeded to write three paragraphs about why they are such a bad company to a Sun Solaris forum." I have had a hotmail account since before Microsoft

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-16 Thread Jim Walker
Stuart, Section 3.5 of the OpenSolaris Constitution addresses these situations. I agree. Religious and political expressions have no place in OpenSolaris technical discussions and David's post was inappropriate and offensive. That said, normally communities don't take action on the first offense.

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-16 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Stuart Kreitman wrote: > More to the point, we need a way to moderate or ban people who spam this > forum with far off topic agendas. The mailman software has that functionality if and when it is needed - it's up to the list owners to decide when a ban is appropriate. -- -Alan Coopersmit

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-16 Thread Stuart Kreitman
More to the point, we need a way to moderate or ban people who spam this forum with far off topic agendas. They are a distraction to our agenda. Stuart Kreitman On 07/15/09 22:54, david wrote: > It is a shame about the multi media support in Solaris. I know that Fluendo > has their shop and y

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-13 Thread Jerry Tan
Hi, anon, we have totem and codeina bundled with NV or opensolaris. If you want to playback MP4/MP2 video, you just need to buy codec from fluendo.com online. > If we paid for the media player, then we could legally get all the codecs and > Sun would make a few bucks out of it for their w

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-13 Thread Che Kristo
Yes in general, that is true...I know Sun holds patents over concepts implemented in GPL code where this is not an issue. In this case it is the fact that MPEG LA, MS et al arent so friendly to FOSS On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Brian Cameron wrote: > > Che: > > Others have covered it pretty

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-13 Thread Che Kristo
Others have covered it pretty well already but it i not about patenting "the code" (which is not possible) but being able to adhere to the GPL's enforced perpetual non-exclusive rights to redistribute. If you took out a patent license you could not guarantee those freedoms to your customer which wo

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-12 Thread Brian Cameron
Che: > Others have covered it pretty well already but it i not about patenting > "the code" (which is not possible) but being able to adhere to the GPL's > enforced perpetual non-exclusive rights to redistribute. If you took out > a patent license you could not guarantee those freedoms to your

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-12 Thread Brian Cameron
Anon Y Mous wrote: >> It becomes more complex than that, if Sun were to take a patent license on >> such GPL'd (VLC) >> code and then sell the product the next person would not be able to pass >> along those GPL >> "freedoms" which would be in violation of the GPL > > You are reading way

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-12 Thread Brian Cameron
From: desktop-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org [mailto:desktop-discuss- >> bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Anon Y Mous >> Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:51 PM >> To: desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >> Subject: Re: [desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available >&g

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-12 Thread William Yang
On Behalf Of Anon Y Mous > Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:51 PM > To: desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available > > > It becomes more complex than that, if Sun were to take a patent license > on such GPL'd (VLC) > > cod

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-11 Thread Che Kristo
It becomes more complex than that, if Sun were to take a patent license on such GPL'd (VLC) code and then sell the product the next person would not be able to pass along those GPL "freedoms" which would be in violation of the GPL Anyway we have Fluendo working on codecs for Gstreamer + the DV

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-11 Thread Anon Y Mous
> It becomes more complex than that, if Sun were to take a patent license on > such GPL'd (VLC) > code and then sell the product the next person would not be able to pass > along those GPL > "freedoms" which would be in violation of the GPL You are reading way too much into what I'm saying

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-10 Thread Paul Gress
Anon Y Mous wrote: > If we paid for the media player, then we could legally get all the codecs and > Sun would make a few bucks out of it for their work. Sounds fair to me. > Isn't that what Fluendo is offering now? They have all the codecs now and reported they are now porting their DVD play

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-09 Thread Anon Y Mous
If we paid for the media player, then we could legally get all the codecs and Sun would make a few bucks out of it for their work. Sounds fair to me. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2009-07-09 Thread Anon Y Mous
I got an idea to revive this thread. How about Sun gives away the OpenSolaris operating system for free but sells people a custom rebuild of VLC media player done by kronox that plays everything just like Microsoft Windows Media Player does, and of course it would come with all the licensed co

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-12 Thread kronox
Most of commercial DVDs are encrypted with CSS. If you want to play these, you require to install DeCSS library. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-10 Thread James Cornell
Brian Cameron wrote: > > James: > >> Why would a user pay $100 USD for a package of codecs anyway? It's just >> ironic these "free" systems are no better off than the closed ones, sure >> it's the proprietary mentality that caused it, but Sun knows how to >> manage both, so get with the times. Fo

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-10 Thread Brian Cameron
James: > Why would a user pay $100 USD for a package of codecs anyway? It's just > ironic these "free" systems are no better off than the closed ones, sure > it's the proprietary mentality that caused it, but Sun knows how to > manage both, so get with the times. For something so ubiquitous to

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-10 Thread James Cornell
Ch? Kristo wrote: > Whilst it is important that we have legally blessed versions of mainstream > codecs there are software packages such as VLC and MPlayer that cater to > those who reside in countries where the relevant patents for the codecs are > not enforceable. > > I wouldn't say that Fluen

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-10 Thread Ché Kristo
Whilst it is important that we have legally blessed versions of mainstream codecs there are software packages such as VLC and MPlayer that cater to those who reside in countries where the relevant patents for the codecs are not enforceable. I wouldn't say that Fluendo exists to cater to 'Linux

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-09 Thread James Cornell
secret squirrel wrote: > i tried lifewithsolaris vlc repo and had varying luck - 1 dvd of 3 that i > tried played. not so good > > more disappointment came whilst reading: > http://www.osnews.com/story/8218 > an interview of ceo from fluendo saying dvd player would be out imminently - > however t

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-09 Thread secret squirrel
i tried lifewithsolaris vlc repo and had varying luck - 1 dvd of 3 that i tried played. not so good more disappointment came whilst reading: http://www.osnews.com/story/8218 an interview of ceo from fluendo saying dvd player would be out imminently - however this article was 4 years old and the

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-04 Thread Ché Kristo
It would be a nice addition to those who chose to have a support contract. Every time this comes up we get the usual response that Solaris/OpenSolaris does not have the volume to justify the licensing cost. So if that is true making the purchase of Fluendo codecs as integrated and seamless as po

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-04 Thread Brian Cameron
> can we get a solaris distribution with licensed codecs (dvd, mp3, mp4, bl4, > bl4, etc) so an end > user does not need to hack the hell out of os. > i am prepared to pay for a distribution with these included. if you could > give it a way free, > suits me too. You can buy WMA/WMV/MP3 codec

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-04 Thread secret squirrel
ok... the first part is solved - looks like i'll be able to blow some money buying codecs this christmas =) http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=81106&tstart=15 that just leaves sun to negotiate with adobe, autodesk & smileycentral to port apps. -- This message posted from opens

[desktop-discuss] licensed codecs available

2008-11-04 Thread secret squirrel
hello, maybe this should be directed at sun microsystems - however it seems a lot of their employees lurk here, so... here goes. can we get a solaris distribution with licensed codecs (dvd, mp3, mp4, bl4, bl4, etc) so an end user does not need to hack the hell out of os. i am prepared to pay f