Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

2013-06-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk wrote: I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although obviously they are parsed from them. Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok. -- You received

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

2013-06-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Public bug reported: The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]: glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low * Resynchronise

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 15 May 2013 20:02, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine1.4 : Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu5) but it is not installable So you probably want to enable i386 repositories to use wine: $ sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this command before and I think it should not be necessary for packages from the universe repository. Usually it is not required. The

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-05-14 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 14 May 2013 16:12, Daniel 1123...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Attachment added: As of 2013-05-14, this is what I still get when trying to install wine with current package database (apt-get update)

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1174509] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

2013-04-30 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174509 Title: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 882825] Re: Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/

2013-04-26 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: gegl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Scott, any chance of an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1077639] Re: Text repaint problems in Emacs

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs24 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077639 Title: Text repaint problems in Emacs Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1078116] Re: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works since 12.04

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) = emacs23 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078116 Title: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1059069] Re: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 removes debhelper/gettext/lintian

2013-02-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1059069] Re: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 removes debhelper/gettext/lintian

2013-02-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
This is almost certainly due to multi-arch issues in wine1.4. See bug 954029 and others. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059069 Title: Installing wine1.4 on amd-64

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1090574] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1082814] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 February 2013 03:54, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote: I agree with the sentiment about apt, however I thought it was the current case that if a recommended (same-arch) package isn't available in the archive, it does get simply ignored. Quite right, for ‘install’ and

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Output from a failed install with ‘-oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=1’ is appreciated. The Debian wine packaging is substantially different. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-utils in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-17 Thread Daniel Hartwig
This is in fact a bug in apt as well. A fresh install of 64-bit raring will try to pull in gnome-exe-thumbnailer:i386, which in turn will ask for icoutils:i386, which will then conflict: libunity-webapps0 : Depends: unity-webapps-service but it is not going to be installed Rather than

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
I'm beginning to think I need to make some automated tests for an elaborate series of multi-arch edge cases. Hi Scott Seems that wine is bringing a lot of these m-a issues to your desk :-) Hopefully this: winetricks is actually arch: all now will be sufficient to avoid immediately having

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 905055] Re: Package needs to be Multi-Arch enabled so Multi-Arch packages can depend on it

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700683 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683 ** Also affects: cabextract (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 905055] Re: Package needs to be Multi-Arch enabled so Multi-Arch packages can depend on it

2013-02-15 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700684 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684 ** Also affects: msttcorefonts (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1025184] Re: Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install

2013-01-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Is there a way how i can run this trigger in some kind of debug mode for having logging messages? The trigger executes only one command, you can invoke it manually without --quiet to see if it behaves similar: # gtk-update-icon-cache --force --quiet /usr/share/icons/hicolor (and/or

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1025184] Re: Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install

2013-01-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
The delay here might not be due to any bug at all. Reassigned to gtk+ packages for their maintainers to determine. Florian, which version of libgtk2.0-bin and libgtk-3-bin are you using? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 743956] Re: Incorrect icon dimension of '22x22/sensors-applet-gpu.png'

2012-12-31 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: hicolor-icon-theme (Ubuntu) = sensors-applet (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hicolor-icon-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743956 Title: Incorrect icon dimension of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 271246] Re: debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable

2012-12-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Please demonstrate how this is caused by a bug in aptitude. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to pidgin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271246

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 1 November 2012 10:23, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote: Upstream says even libgettext isn't needed at runtime, apparently -- Wine only needs to build the translations into the windows format, and then just uses those. I'm prepping an SRU. Makes sense. The Debian packaging does

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel Hartwig
I am double-checking with upstream now though. Appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Recently brought up on debian-devel@ [1]. Wine maintainers, your “Recommends: gettext” is most likely incorrect. Please attend to this issue. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00410.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1071566] Re: delete button does not delete anything in aptitude

2012-10-26 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1071565 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071565 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1071565 delete button does not delete anything -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
There are conflicts with: - gettext and gettext:i386 - gettext-base and gettext-base:i386 Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it the same error as bug #954029? ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Almost all duplicates here have wine1.4 packages involved. Binary packages wine1.4-i386 and wine1.4-amd64 both have “Recommends: gettext”, which is Multi-Arch: allowed. As a result the system attempts to install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The wine1.4 packages

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The wine1.4 packages should *consider* whether they actually use the package gettext … -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
At this point the issue is invalid for gettext. This actual cause is other packages declaring inappropriate relationships with gettext. See previous comment. ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it the same error as bug #954029? Never mind. That bug (and it's duplicates) all involve wine1.4 packages, so this is definitely a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any or are not required/useful

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
At least one report here (bug #977078) features playonlinux which depends on gettext-base. That report also contains the wine1.4 packages which are problematic, though since playonlinux is arch: all and appears to be using gettext-base for it's shell script support the dependency in playonlinux

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Structure of gettext packaging in Debian is currently being discussed http://bugs.debian.org/683751, and it is likely this will no longer be an issue for playonlinux. The wine1.4 recommends still needs to be examined. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #683751

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** No longer affects: playonlinux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 948863] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libso

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 971985] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.g

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 973309] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 986448] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 991519] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 986448 package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1037390] Re: package libgail18 2.24.10-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/doc/libgail18/changelog.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Precise) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Oneiric) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899316] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899482] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 899706] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is dif

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1044561] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1040842] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1006016] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005848] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1006687] Re: wine install, package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1001905] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1010086] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1032127] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1016011] Re: Software center didn't install Wine

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1009203] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012366] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012345] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1012359] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
This is [1] affecting multiple packages and fixed in gettext 0.18.1.1-8. The fix should be SRU to Precise and all affected packages will need to be rebuilt. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671257 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #669985

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
See also bug #924628 which has similar symptoms but is already addressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 Title: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1014431] Re: Trying to update, no window control on the top (ie minimize close), left control key won't work (right ctrl key still does), stuck in 640x480, I'm running a 64bit

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on t

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Attachment added: 06-msgfmt-default-little-endian https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gettext/+bug/1039685/+attachment/3363497/+files/06-msgfmt-default-little-endian ** Summary changed: - package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039685] Re: gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid, quantal]

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Scratch that. Since the archs involved are i386 and amd64 this is probably just bug #924628 again. ** No longer affects: gettext (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gettext ** Summary changed: - gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1003556] Re: package libcdparanoia0 3.10.2+debian-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libcdparanoia0/README.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Also affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cdparanoia in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 Title: gzip -9n sometimes generates a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 989166] Re: package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 974934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 974934 package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- You received

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is dif

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899316 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Are you sure that this is the correct behavior? Yes. Some time before I have opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an application in the background I could close the terminal without closing the

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 19:17, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I don't know it but with nohup the process will be a direct child of init after closing the terminal. If so then do not use nohup for this purpose. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 September 2012 19:48, Sworddragon 819...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: So there is no difference for me. My mistake then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
The same problem appears in LXTerminal too. Maybe a shared component is affected by this problem. FYI the shared component in this case is the shell (usually /usr/bin/bash or similar) which is run by these terminal programs. Processes started by a shell are (typically) terminated when that

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Comment #1 is correct. This is the intended behaviour of the system. When you start a process it is always as a child of another, usually some session. Graphically, you log in to a desktop session. When you start gnome-terminal you are beginning a separate shell session and any programs

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

2012-09-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Bug #376147 tracks the issue of gnome-terminal not warning that closing the terminal will terminate background processes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819842

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 369696] Re: package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-13 Thread Daniel Hartwig
My problem is now fixed. I will try and explain what happened. I had a broken soft link that was preventing me from doing the updates. (as you can see in the term.log) Changing symlinks in /usr/bin is user error. The ValueError from the log is a safety check against such a user error. Not a