[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1373928]

2014-10-05 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #23) Sorry, I was probably not clear enough in my first comment. :-/ (In reply to comment #22) So we should change the dlopen() mechanism in the mergedlibs case Ideally we would just kill this dlopen. That's a good plan for master, and WiP is at

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1373928]

2014-09-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #21) Worth checking for symbol conflicts between dbaccess and mergedlibs I guess; And I spotted: createDataAccessToolsFactory which looks unusual to me. OTOH, it seems to be defined only there, and only used / declared in other places. My guess is more in the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1373928]

2014-09-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #10) Ah, in 8165fc23014c8044c131cb6e1fd0c5e06fd0da2d I've added dbtools to libmerged just to fix circular dependency without checking it's OK. Or, get dbtools out of libmerged and create some hack for whatever was the reason to link against dbtools in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1373928]

2014-09-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
My meaning was if svxcore deals with database stuff, it is normal it uses a database stuff utility functions library. Another approach would be to tailor what's in dbtools. Maybe we can move stuff from it to another library if it helps? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 986880]

2014-07-26 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #7) If we suppose_pType-aCreateParams.isEmpty() is useful, here's a naive patch: diff --git a/dbaccess/source/ui/tabledesign/FieldDescriptions.cxx b/dbaccess/source/ui/tabledesign/FieldDescriptions.cxx index 65fb772..d3495a8 100644 ---

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1242355]

2013-12-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Could you please attach the .odb file that makes it crash? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242355 Title: [Upstream] LibreOffice Base connection to mdb via odbc

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1242355]

2013-12-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #5) Reproduced on two different machines: - libreoffice 4.1.3.2 (Debian package): infinite loop (memory consumption) This was with mdbtools 0.7.1-1. This also is a mdbtools bug: calling SQLGetData on column 4 (TABLE_TYPE) of SQLTables returns SQL_NO_TOTAL in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1242355]

2013-12-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Reproduced on two different machines: - libreoffice 4.1.3.2 (Debian package): infinite loop (memory consumption) - libreoffice 4.1 my own development tree: segfault in ODBC code -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1242355]

2013-12-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Crash goes away (on Debian) after upgrading unixodbc to 2.3.1-1. So until hint to the contrary, seems to be a bug in UnixODBC - NOTOURBUG. It does not work though, the list of tables is empty. This seems to be a mdbtools bug, because isql also cannot get the list of tables. Try: echo help |

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 127505]

2013-09-19 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #17) @Lionel: Out of curiosity, with that change, does it still pass the tests of http://plugfest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=scenarios:20100415:yearfrac Yes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1103420]

2013-07-19 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
outdated install instructions: website -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103420 Title: LibreOffice Base can’t find Java installation—does not work Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 93546]

2012-10-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #60) Any more joy in finding / splitting out the component parts of this multi-issue bug ? You are right, there was enough time for that to happen, now closing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 849995]

2012-09-04 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
@Fridrich: this bug was corrected by the use typedefs and endianess from sal patch hunk from icc/SampleICC-1.3.2.patch Since you removed that file, I'm going to blindly reassign to you. Please take a look. See commits: 3b32204d9f900130cd1877675d8b51281b81f90d

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 93546]

2012-09-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #56) When I search for more Information the URL sdbc:address:kab was not found. I think it could not be found, because the right URL has to be sdbc:kab. Thats the URL I see, when I open Extras → Options →LibreOffice Base → Connections. I think sdbc:address:kab is the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 93546]

2012-09-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #56) Tried to connect KDE-Adressbook. OpenSuSE 11.4, 32bit, LO 3.3.4 and LO 3.5.4.2 → connection works OK, as we have reports that: - it works on 32 bits - does not work on 32 bits I'm going to assume this is *not* related to 32/64 bits. More fundamentally, I have the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Tested on Debian GNU/Linux amd64, LibreOffice 3.5.5.3 .deb packages downloaded from www.libreoffice.org (not the ones provided by Debian). 1) Menu Tools / Options / Internet / E-mail 2) Enter /usr/bin/mutt for field E-mail program 3) Click on OK 4) Send as PDF from a Base report works -- You

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Tested with LibreOffice 3.4.6 (package provided by Debian). Send / E-mail as PDF works with /usr/bin/mutt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433563 Title: [Upstream]

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
I originally had sensible-ooomuas as E-mail application set in LibreOffice; this looks like a Debian extension (which Ubuntu inherited). With this, I get same error message as original reporter. Two problems there: 1) Internet search suggests the right historical setting is sensible- ooomua

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(In reply to comment #11) I originally had sensible-ooomuas as E-mail application set in LibreOffice; this looks like a Debian extension (which Ubuntu inherited). With this, I get same error message as original reporter. Two problems there: 1) Internet search suggests the right historical

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Reproduced in my libreoffice-3-5 dev tree with *legacy* report, not report builder report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433563 Title: [Upstream] Base Report

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Traced the calls; the difference is in SfxMailModel::SaveDocumentAsFormat in file sfx2/source/dialog/mailmodel.cxx Interesting things happen around line 419: In the working case (Report Builder report), aQuery looks like: uno::Sequence of length 3 = {{ Name = Type, Value = uno::Any

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Reproduction instructions for people not familiar with LibreOffice Base: download attachment 63667. Open in LibreOffice. Click on Reports, double-click on City Filter. It asks for parameter Cidade, enter London (without the quotes), click OK. Menu File / Send / E-mail as PDF -- You received

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 433563]

2012-07-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
work-around: 1) menu File / Save Copy as 2) save into some temporary file 3) open said temporary file 4) send as PDF 5) delete temporary file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 93546]

2012-06-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Summary: - May be related to 32 bits / 64 bits; works on 64 bits, fails on 32 bits. - May be related to version of libebook installed and deprecated / removed symbols; see comment 47. Any future testers, please *always* say whether you use 32 bits or 64 bits, and what libebook-*.so* you have