The updates look good, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221
Title:
Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
In
Hi Jeremy,
This looks mostly good, AFAICT.
Could you please complete the SRU bug template by adding the section
'Where problems could occur' / 'Regression potential'? [1]
And although the 'Test Case' is feasible to understand, based on the 'Impact'
section, it would be nice to have a
I tested this with a local package build and local repo in a mantic container,
doing an `apt --dry-run dist-upgrade` without/with that repo (w/ noble apt
sources list),
and manually download/run noble's release upgrader without/with that repo.
The behavior is the same (ie, no regressions) as
Verification done on mantic-proposed.
On arm64 with ubuntu-desktop-minimal installed,
running do-release-upgrade from lunar to mantic
(with mantic-proposed enabled and pinning setup)
does install `protection-domain-mapper` and
`qrtr-tools` (`flash-kernel` already installed).
Test Steps:
---
Hi Rico,
Thanks for the clarifications!
> 1) 2) 3) 6) are packaging bugs regarding Java support
> Those are needed to allow Java support to be disabled on specific archs if
> needed.
> Fortunately this wasn't required yet while the already applied mitigations to
> the bridgetests still are
Hi Rico,
Thanks for the nice and detailed SRU template, and all the testing.
While looking at this, particularly the changes in the packaging,
there are a few points that seem to warrant clarification, since
are apparently not related/supporting the upstream bug fixes, or
are not justified as to
Verification (synthetic) of the XDG_SESSION_TYPE fix in Mantic:
$ lsb_release -cs
No LSB modules are available.
mantic
The packages are downloaded from Launchpad librarian
since previous versions are not available in archive.
Before the fix (reverted) // 1:23.10.12
---
Summary for Mantic SRUs.
There are 3 LP bugs combined in mantic-proposed
(list sorted by package version so it's helpful).
1) Bug 2034986, used twice,
1A) First for 1:23.10.9, for 'fix v1':
* Temporary font for Ubuntu MATE (LP: #2034986)
It's released to mantic-updates with 1:23.10.10
Happy to (in addition to comment #19) confirm that qpdf + libqpdf29 from
noble-release and mantic/lunar-proposed fix the issue.
noble:
---
$ lsb_release -cs
No LSB modules are available.
noble
$ wget -q https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/files/12885974/018.pdf
Marking Noble as Fix Released (11.6.3-1).
$ git log --oneline -1 pkg/ubuntu/noble | cat
03517080d29d 11.6.3-1 (patches unapplied)
$ git show pkg/ubuntu/noble -- libqpdf/QPDFTokenizer.cc
** Changed in: qpdf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039328
Title:
Update ubuntu-meta with
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* ubuntu-seeds were changed since last meta update
* to ensure correct upgrades; regenerate ubuntu-meta with contents / changes
done before release
[ Test Plan ]
* Check that arm64 upgrades of ubuntu-desktop-minimal from lunar to
mantic
Updated regression potential with theoretical issues, and other info
with status in main for protection-domain-mapper and qrtr.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * ubuntu-seeds were changed since last meta update
- * to ensure correct upgrades; regenerate ubuntu-meta with contents /
(unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039328
Title:
Update ubuntu-meta with promotions done between last ubuntu-meta bu
Marking Kinetic as Won't Fix (release close to EOL, as mentioned in an
email thread).
** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Tags added: se-sponsor-dgadomski
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974293
Title:
gnome-shell crashed on logout with SIGSEGV in
js::gc::Cell::storeBuffer() from
uricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Medium => Undecided
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Mauricio Faria d
Hi Luka/@zapduke,
Can you test/verify bionic-proposed?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838152
Title:
gnome-shell freezes on notification arrival (fixed
** Patch added: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297502/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Mauricio
After discussing this with Eric (slashd) and Marc (mdeslaur),
it seems like the Breaks: approach is indeed the way to go.
Nonetheless, it doesn't warrant an USN notice (security-only),
which is the bit that could make Landscape (problem trigger)
to pick up the new ghostscript fix then update
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
-(which is possible)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
+
+ * This is possible as Landscape does not consider the
+-security pocket (has both ghostscript/cups-filters)
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
- (which is possible; eg unattended-upgrade/landscape)
+(which is possible)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
-
- * Landscape and unattended-upgrade allows packages
-
The approach to fix/deliver this is under discussion for a bit.
We'll move forward once that's more clearly defined.
** Patch removed: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297380/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
** Patch
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
- (which is possible, including via Landscape tooling)
+ (which is possible; eg unattended-upgrade/landscape)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
- * Landscape allows
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
(which is possible, including via Landscape tooling)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
* Landscape allows packages updates to USN-only thus
ghostscript is
** Patch added: "lp1848210_xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297381/+files/lp1848210_xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
Test packages used for verification in comments #1 and #2
built successfully on all architectures, ppa:mfo/sf246942 [1].
[1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/sf246942
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript
** Patch added: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297380/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
Testing on Xenial
---
Files)
$ wget -O ppd-with-pdf-support.ppd
'http://www.openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=hl7x0
=Brother-HL-1020=1'
$ wget -O dummy.pdf
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/resources/pdf/dummy.pdf
Test 0) Before updating ghostscript or cups-filters
$ dpkg
Testing on Bionic
---
Files)
$ wget -O ppd-with-pdf-support.ppd
'http://www.openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=hl7x0
=Brother-HL-1020=1'
$ wget -O dummy.pdf
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/resources/pdf/dummy.pdf
Test 0) Before updating ghostscript or cups-filters
$ dpkg
** Description changed:
- Add a Breaks: relationship to cups-filter to prevent LP#1828401.
+ [Impact]
- Landscape allows packages updates to only USNs, so ghostscript
- can be updated to a version that breaks the older cups-filters.
+ * After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
+
** Summary changed:
- ghostscript: add Breaks: relationship to cups-filter
+ ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848210
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: sts
** Summary changed:
- ghostscript: add breaks relationship to cups-filter
+ ghostscript: add Breaks: relationship to
: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo
portance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo
Christian,
Thanks for handling this.
> But the more that are affected the more I think then general solution
in lightdm would be the right thing to do.
Yes, that's my interpretation too -- and it was my impression from the
beginning, with your report/analysis, as I couldn't find anything we
37 matches
Mail list logo
