Ryan,
The problem is not that a recent change in resolvconf caused a
regression.
The problem with resolvconf is that the upgrade to network-manager
exposed an existing bug in resolvconf.
This happens because the new version of network-manager now tells
resolvconf that it must only use a
After two and a half weeks, can we please get a build of resolvconf with
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=2675f2061525bc954be14988d64384b74aa7bf8b
applied pushed out?
We don't even need the full new release of resolvconf, we just need the
documented bug
So, this managed to break at least my VPN setup quite well.
See #1672491 with the details, but the short version is that 'specify
egress interface for each dnsmasq upstream server' breaks things in two
cases.
The first could be argued to be a bug on the VPN client side, though a
behavior change
Alright, this is due to a change to 1.2.4:
commit 2f12f485607590d6415cf5fb81ad4db5b04615cd
Author: Beniamino Galvani
Date: Wed May 11 18:43:41 2016 +0200
dns: specify egress interface for each dnsmasq upstream server
Currently we don't specify to dnsmasq
Public bug reported:
Alright, this is going to be a frustrating bug for everyone involved I
expect, but here goes.
On Ubuntu 16.04, using a non-released VPN client (making this _much_
harder for anyone to reproduce), upgrading the network-manager packages
from 1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.3 to
5 matches
Mail list logo