[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039654] Re: "files" license still mentions nautilus

2012-08-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
well "files" is the new "user facing name" they picked for their browser,the same way they call totem "videos" or want to call their photo app "photo",they didn't rename the project,tarball,source etc though. But feel free to raise the issue on bugzilla.gnome.org, we have too many issues there and

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039654] Re: "files" license still mentions nautilus

2012-08-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
@Seb -- I was just confused why it's called files -- and if it's being called "Files", the license should reflect that as well.. The whole thing is quite odd, since it is after all nautilus.. /me is confused -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039654] Re: "files" license still mentions nautilus

2012-08-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks for no thanks, the tarball upstream is still named nautilus as are all of their sources, what sort of a bug is that? ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification becau

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039654] Re: "files" license still mentions nautilus

2012-08-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039654 Title: "files" license still mentions nautilus Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Files aka "GNO