[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~freerdp-remote-team/lightdm-remote-session- freerdp/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm-remote-session-freerdp - 1.0-0ubuntu1 --- lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (1.0-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Adding apparmor wrapper to ensure protection (LP: #1049849) * debian/control: * Add depends on

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lightdm-remote-session-freerdp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure - 1.1-0ubuntu1 --- lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (1.1-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Adding apparmor wrappers (LP: #1049849) * debian/control: * Going to arch any as we

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~remote-login-service-team/lightdm-remote-session- uccsconfigure/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ted/lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure/apparmor- profile -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-14 Thread Ted Gould
** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ted Gould (ted) ** Changed in:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ted/lightdm-remote-session-freerdp/apparmor- profile -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by guest

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-13 Thread Steve Beattie
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-13 Thread Robert Ancell
The way AppArmour profiles are applied in lightdm is based on the session process name. So in the case of the guest session lightdm runs /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session-wrapper which then runs the actual session process (e.g. gnome-session). The binary name

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-13 Thread Robert Ancell
Thinking over this has made me rethink how guest sessions are implemented in LightDM. The AppArmor code has always been an awkward fit in the daemon (which can't possibly know what resources a session will require). I propose for LightDM 1.6 that the guest sessions are externally defined with

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-12 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Tags added: rls-q-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049849 Title: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile Status in “lightdm” package

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-12 Thread Marc Deslauriers
How to reproduce: - Guest account: - open session - open terminal - cd /home;ls should give Permission denied and dmesg should show AppArmor denial - Remote Login: - Click on Remote Login help icon in greeter - Click on Set up button - open terminal - cd /home;ls should fail, but

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1049849] Re: Remote Login account not confined by guest AppArmor profile

2012-09-12 Thread Ted Gould
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ted Gould (ted) ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.