If there is a reason why the numbering must remain in the current state,
could the YEAR.MONTH be added to the package description. In such a way,
there would be no confusion and the packaging name could remain as it
is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Thank you for reporting this, however I think this is more a request
than a bug. I'm pretty sure that the Ubuntu packages are different (and
therefore numbered differently) to the upstream releases.
** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug
2 matches
Mail list logo
