Tobias,
Thanks for pointing that out. I don't know how I managed to confuse red
with green. I think it was late. :)
Till,
I understand what you're saying. It would definitely not be helpful for
two copies of a 3 page document to be printed on only 3 sheets of paper
if you wanted to hand out
No full analysis yet, but a first point:
The line was deleted in the commit, not added.
Therefore it is correct, that it is also missing later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
Note that if you request two copies of a one-page document the correct
behavior is getting two one-sided documents. It is wrong to get two
pages of different copies on the same sheet, as this way you cannot
separate the copies. For example if you print a 3-page document you
should get page 1 and
Upon further investigation, this appears to be a regression. Rev 7036
http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/loggerhead/openprinting/cups-
filters/revision/7036#filter/pdftopdf/pdftopdf_processor.cc added a
single line: outputno++;:
if (param.mirror) {
curpage-mirror();
}
4 matches
Mail list logo
