[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-03-13 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Hans-Peter, this bug report is being closed due to your last comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1238188/comments/48 regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-03-10 Thread Hans-Peter
Please close this bug report. I moved on to 14.04 where the issue is gone! many thanks for your help Hans-Peter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238188 Title: [HP Compaq

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-13 Thread Hans-Peter
Christopher, I've already tried this earlier in the process (tried to bisect the kernel), but failed on it. Also I guess, bisecting is not really necessary, because we know the point in time when the error arose. On the other hand, in Trusty the problem is most possible solved. My plan now

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-10 Thread Hans-Peter
Christopher, I've already done this. First of all, I tried Ubuntu. But this was not very successful. It advanced up to the 'Ubuntu' writing. From there on, the red dot hopped until I stopped the system. I let it hop for about 5 minutes. regards, Hans-Peter -- You received this bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-10 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Hans-Peter, thank you for performing the requested test. The next step would be to fully commit bisect from Raring to Saucy in order to identify the offending commit. Could you please do this following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Bisecting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-09 Thread Hans-Peter
Christopher, I tried with the latest kubuntu image. Unfortunately the desktop was not usable, because the mouse was missing and the desktop was only half build (kicker was missing...) but I was able to switch to a console screen and have a look at the /var/log/Xorg.0.log. I found a lot of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-09 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Hans-Peter, thank you for your comment. As a WORKAROUND test, could you please test an alternative DE (Xubuntu, Ubuntu, etc.) to see if a proper test would be able to be performed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2014-01-05 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Hans-Peter, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1238188] Re: [HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor PC] No desktop effects on a radeon 3100 graphics card in saucy

2013-11-05 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Restoring regression-update tag as per Bug Description: After the update on Sept. 30. all the graphics performance was gone. Given the results of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1238188/comments/32 this may not be kernel regression, but a regression in something else to be