** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564616
Title:
detaching lightdm into background
Status in lightdm
Hi
Is this bug fixed? Do you need other information / patch?
Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:17:42AM -, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> [Expired for lightdm (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
> days.]
>
> ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
>Status: Incomplete =>
[Expired for lightdm (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
Ah, I missed the -b. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564616
Title:
detaching lightdm into background
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug
Hi
Should work fine. -b is the same as --background
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564616
Title:
detaching lightdm into background
Status in lightdm
Debian does it differently - is there any advantage over each method?
I'm wondering if we should just copy the Debian init script entirely,
given the Ubuntu version seems very out of date.
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Also, a merge proposal is easier to handle than a diff.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564616
Title:
detaching lightdm into background
Status in lightdm package in
7 matches
Mail list logo
