[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-10-02 Thread Mathew Hodson
** No longer affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: fonts-android (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626245 Title:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-10-02 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
@Joshua: Assuming that the server team wants to keep the ISO size CD compatible also in 17.04, your calculation indicates that you would need to use an alternative package for Chinese fonts even if we would do the split I mentioned in comment #4. So I would say that the ball is in your court now.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ghostscript - 9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu6 --- ghostscript (9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu6) yakkety; urgency=medium * debian/rules: + Revert the dependency change in 9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu3 (LP: #1625734, LP: #1626245). -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-22 Thread Joshua Powers
Here is my back-of-the-envelope calculation: If the target size is 703MiB, today we are 812MiB, over by 109MiB. If the GCC6 packages do indeed shrink down to GCC5 sizes (~90 -> ~30) that will save 60MiB and removing fonts-noto-cjk and adding fonts- android removes another (76 - 2) 74MiB. The new

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-22 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
On 2016-09-22 15:18, Michael Terry wrote: > Is there another way to solve bug 1625734 than going back to > fonts-android? > > Is it possible to split fonts-noto-cjk into smaller chunks for > example? Yes it is. We did consider doing so last spring, but decided not to; please see

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-22 Thread Michael Terry
I mean, it's fine to put this back if we need it. It used to be in main, it's just fonts, etc. But for the same reasons that we downgraded it (has a replacement), it would still be nice to drop it again in the future. Is there another way to solve bug 1625734 than going back to fonts-android?

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1626245] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-22 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Patch attached to bug #1625734. ** Also affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu)