Could we eventually use xdg-desktop-portal?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1490186
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1490186
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1490186
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subs
Hmmm, interesting!
I wouldn't hold out too long on giving the friendly tools smarts
vis-a-vis conditionals, since that kind of logic isn't necessarily
straightforward (i.e. can be hard/time-consuming to implement), it's not
necessary for power/paranoid users (we're happy resorting to a text
editor
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:35:58PM -, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> I think we could really use some kind of conditional construct (IF ...
> THEN ...) in AppArmor syntax. Everything being talking about here
apparmor_parser does in fact have conditionals of exactly this form. They
aren't documente
I think we could really use some kind of conditional construct (IF ...
THEN ...) in AppArmor syntax. Everything being talking about here
should, ideally, be adjustable using tunables. With a debconf
configuration option, even.
Between users who want strict access control to user files, and users
w
Hello.
I think that the default Firefox profile can be made more restrictive,
stricter. It's pretty simple and can be done by removing a few default
rules (mentioned in bug report by Vlad K., for example) etc. Anyway,
here are some ideas (based on testing made in the past).
As an example, we can
I have created simialr bug in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1609439 . It's confusing having
too (or more?) Firefoxes in launchpad...
My original issue was that usr.bin.firefox contains kinda..
misinformation, if I may, with rules like:
owner @{HOME}/Downloads/* rw,
while included user-
Jamie,
thanks for the elaborate explanation and directing the issue where it
matters.
I'd just like to comment on switching the issue to "firefox" package and
"the firefox profile can be adjusted to remove the user-files
abstraction ..."
Removal of "user-files" abstraction would weaken the secur
Clarification re snaps and the 'home' interface> the 'home' interface
does not grant access to toplevel hidden files and directories.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16625
8 matches
Mail list logo