[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-09-12 Thread Thorsten
you probably have to apply the ubuntu tilix "pcre2-version-update" patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-09-11 Thread Stu
I just tried building tilix to see if I could add some feature and hit this :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-09-03 Thread Thorsten
tilix seems to be warning-free with unpatched vte. Someone has posted these warnings upstream: https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/issues/1428 and the response was "Please open a bug with Ubuntu, since they patch vte to remove pcre2 regular expressions this issue is likely caused by that." a ** Bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Fix: "I have to admit I don't know what this regex *flag* is for..." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> So the cause is that the MULTILINE flag is just that not set during compilation? Compilation of the regex when running tilix, not compilation of the source code. I have to admit I don't know what this regex is for, and whether required in unpatched vte or not. If tilix is warning-free with

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Thorsten
thanks a lot for the clarification, this is really helping me to understand that! I am just a noob who wants to learn something and wants to find the cause of a problem which annoys me. Thus, i invested some time to dig into the problem :) So the cause is that the MULTILINE flag is just that not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Egmont Koblinger
> As you can see both arguments itself are true. The first two arguments you printed are bitmasks, it doesn't make sense to directly interpret them as boolean. > But why is a "bitwise and" used in g_warn_if_fail()? Because that's what it wants to do: warn if the MULTILINE flag isn't set,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Thorsten
i should be more precise with the file name... the specific line is in src/vtegtk.cc line 1906 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-31 Thread Thorsten
Hi everyone, I don't know which is the right place to post this, but the discussion here seems to be the most appropriate for bringing this up. I looked more into the tilix warnings. After all, the warnings seem to be caused by the vte lib and especially in the reverted parts. Therefore, I

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-26 Thread Thorsten
ari, i already have created a bug report for the tilix log messages: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tilix/+bug/1785885 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Ari, if tilix is logging excessively, please report the issue to the tilix developers. The Ubuntu tilix patch is really minimal and shouldn't have that effect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-08-22 Thread Ari
This is still breaking tilix functionality and polluting the logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2018-05-13 Thread Sebastian Geiger
This is really a mess. If we as developers cannot trust a particular version of a library to contain the features advertised by the documentation then that is a big problem. As a developer working on open source software in my spare time I have enough to do to keep up with the latest library

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-06-01 Thread Max Ehrlich
Just throwing my hat in the ring as absolutely no one of influence: I think reverting functionality that is understood to be in a particular version of a package is inviting breakage. If VTE 0.48.x is understood to have PCRE2 support, as announced by the VTE developers, then applications that

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-05-08 Thread Gerald Nunn
I have an upstream bug report for tilix in Ubuntu 17.10 where the VTE is complaining about not supporting PCRE2 despite VTE reporting that it is version 0.48.2 which should support it. https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/issues/916 Is this caused by Ubuntu going with the #3 option and reverting the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-05-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-terminal - 3.24.1-0ubuntu2 --- gnome-terminal (3.24.1-0ubuntu2) artful; urgency=medium * Revert 01_onlyshowin.patch to use Unity instead of Unity7 to fix test failure triggered by desktop-file-validate -- Jeremy Bicha

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-05-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package vte2.91 - 0.48.2-0ubuntu2 --- vte2.91 (0.48.2-0ubuntu2) artful; urgency=medium * Don't depend or build-depend on libpcre2-dev -- Jeremy Bicha Tue, 02 May 2017 14:28:14 -0400 ** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-03-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Fred, please file a different bug for that issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48 Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-03-01 Thread Fred
This is how my GNOME Terminal 3.20.2 looks under Wayland. It looks as expected under X though. Notice the ugly broken shadow. ** Attachment added: "GNOME Terminal 3.20.2 on Wayland"

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-03-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-03-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Unfortunately, upstream for gnome-terminal and vte doesn't care to provide NEWS files. I said that gnome-terminal and vte hadn't changed much in the 3.24 cycle but there were changes in the 3.22 (0.46) cycle - Add systemd user service - Add Detach Terminal action to tab context menu (this is

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Stéphane Graber
I'm not seeing a compelling reason to switch to 3.24 and the newer vte other than the version bump. If your argument is that after this revert, both gnome-terminal and vte are effectively identical feature-wise as what we have in the archive right now, then you're not introducing or removing

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Iain Lane
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:00:02PM -, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > I don't like the revert idea either. > > But like I pointed out almost 4 months ago, there are just 3 options, right? > 1. Accept PCRE2 in main > 2. Keep gnome-terminal at 3.20 and vte at 0.44 indefinitely > 3. Revert the PCRE2

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Jeremy Bicha
I don't like the revert idea either. But like I pointed out almost 4 months ago, there are just 3 options, right? 1. Accept PCRE2 in main 2. Keep gnome-terminal at 3.20 and vte at 0.44 indefinitely 3. Revert the PCRE2 changes, which allows postponing a choice between the first two. I don't

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Iain Lane
Oh come on, there's no hive mind conspiracy against you here, you know that. It's individual developers answering questions that are asked of them and giving you their own judgement. If you'd have asked me before starting this work then I would have given the same answer ("do it only if the other

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Isn't that the opposite of how Feature Freeze Exception requests go, that it should be more likely to be accepted if there are *not* many changes? Yesterday, it was reported that Ubuntu will have GNOME 3.24. And the first thing a GNOME packager for another distro said was well it isn't really

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-21 Thread Iain Lane
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 06:15:21PM -, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > ** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Low > > ** Description changed: > > gnome-terminal and vte are still at their 3.20 (and 0.44) versions > because they now hard-depend on pcre2, but the pcre2 MIR (LP:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666264] Re: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48

2017-02-20 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Description changed: gnome-terminal and vte are still at their 3.20 (and 0.44) versions because they now hard-depend on pcre2, but the pcre2 MIR (LP: #163) has stalled because there is already one version of pcre in