On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:35 PM Mattia Rizzolo
<1943...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> As a member of the Debian LibreOffice Team, and also as an Ubuntu
> Developer, I'm likewise not convinced that starting to build and ship
> graphite2's static library is a really useful thing to do.
>
> I'm perso
As a member of the Debian LibreOffice Team, and also as an Ubuntu
Developer, I'm likewise not convinced that starting to build and ship
graphite2's static library is a really useful thing to do.
I'm personally generically against static libraries, since I regularly see
grief caused by poor trackin
Debian wontfixed the change so it means we will need to carry a delta at
the cost of increased workload from our team if we take the change. Not
saying that we should be we need to weight the cost over time and the
benefit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Changed in: graphite2 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943984
Title:
No archive files for static compilation are inclu
** Also affects: graphite2 (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994757
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994757
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #994757
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994757
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in
Thank for your bug report, the package is in sync with Debian so could
you report the issue there?
** Changed in: graphite2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu
The attachment "debdiff.patch" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you
8 matches
Mail list logo