@mantas: The use of internal hartfbuzz implies/requires internal
graphite. [1]
[1]
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/configure.ac?h=libreoffice-7-4#n10839
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in
@ricotz, thanks, but I still don't understand why you use external graphite in
Kinetic and Lunar and internal in Jammy and Bionic,
when the same graphite2 1.3.14-1build2 released at 2022-03-28 is in Lunar,
Kinetic and Jammy, also in Bionic is almost the same - 1.3.13-11build1 version,
see
@mantas: Libreoffice provides conditional paths to work with older
harfbuzz versions. Unfortunately this can lead to bugs like [1] [2].
While bionic and focal doesn't provide the required versions after all,
I decided to have a consistent base for all backports.
[1]
@ricotz , I don't understand why you use internal graphite and harfbuzz
in jammy-backports, while the same graphite2 and harfbuzz version is in
Kinetic and Jammy? See
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphite2
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/harfbuzz
libreoffice
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
Yes, it seems that René didn't follow the latest rules about epochs, and
used it to revent accidental uploads (multiple!) of 7.5 to unstable
instead of experimental.
The current policy states that in those cases he should have used the
+really notation, but I reckon he wouldn't have liked to
Yeah the epoch bump for 7.5 came from debian. There is not much of the
choice but to follow it.
7.4.6 is in kinetic-updates now and these backports can be accepted :-)
Regarding bionic, afaik it will be open for uploads until May 31st.
Therefore 7.4.7 should be possible as final update.
--
You
Wow someone got crazy with the epoch, jumping from 1 to 4! Wonder what
happened there... (not relevant to this backport, just surprising ;-)
It LGTM, but the backport-from is still in kinetic-proposed (from lp:
2009354), so we need to wait for that to migrate into kinetic-updates
first.
Also for
** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo18.04.1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+attachment/5655368/+files/libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo18.04.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo20.04.1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+attachment/5655367/+files/libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo20.04.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo22.04.1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+attachment/5655366/+files/libreoffice_7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_bpo22.04.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* LibreOffice 7.4.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.4 line:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.4#7.4.6_release
* This source packages matches the proposed SRU for kinetic handled at
12 matches
Mail list logo
