[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2021-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be fixed for that release ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-07-23 Thread Ara Pulido
Not critical enough to get in the OEM priority queue ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: oem-priority/precise Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Invalid = Won't Fix ** Changed in: oem-priority/precise

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-18 Thread James M. Leddy
Okay, thank you for that information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968 Title: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-17 Thread James M. Leddy
Hi Ryan, Can the same fix be applied to the equivalent packages in precise? If so, I will be requesting that we SRU these changes once upstream agrees to them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-17 Thread Ryan Lortie
hi James, Unfortunately we handle suspend in a much more ad-hoc way on precise. There is no logind or systemd-shim through which all suspend requests are handled. These changes are therefore not really possible to backport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-04 Thread Ryan Lortie
We fixed this issue in saucy by moving responsibility for handling suspend into systemd-shim and adding a check there to ignore suspend requests that come in during a very small window after waking up. From personal reports, this has solved the issue for everyone who has tried it. I'm not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-03-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Ryan agreed to talk to upstream/have a look to the issue, reassigning to him ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) = Ryan Lortie (desrt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-03-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could somebody upstream the GNOME bug against gnome-settings-daemon: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-settings-daemon ? Unassigning the desktop team, we don't have currently anyone with spare cycles to look at that, and it seems really a minor issue: it's not easy to trigger