[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1556665] Re: gvfsd consumes 100% of processor on Xenial

2016-03-13 Thread sibe39
(My Laptop is : Asus N76) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556665 Title: gvfsd consumes 100% of processor on Xenial Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1556665] [NEW] gvfsd consumes 100% of processor on Xenial

2016-03-13 Thread sibe39
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu Mate 16.04, gvfsd consumes 100% of processor the first time boot. cf : http://nsa37.casimages.com/img/2016/03/13/160313034108614233.jpg ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1556665] Re: gvfsd consumes 100% of processor on Xenial

2016-03-13 Thread sibe39
** Tags added: gvfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556665 Title: gvfsd consumes 100% of processor on Xenial Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu: New Bug description:

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1409032] Re: gvfsd-smb: very high CPU utilisation

2016-05-07 Thread sibe39
bug is resolved, this "IPV6" who overloading cpu. 2016-05-07 22:59 GMT+02:00 Paul Eggert : > This happened to me too, I think just after I started up Rhythmbox on my > 16.04 desktop. I don't use Windows shares. It's pretty annoying. > > -- > You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

2018-08-30 Thread sibe39
I agree ! Canonical should not impose snap, this should remain a secondary alternative that should not be prioritized over classic apt repositories. A snap should only appear if there is no alternative! Snap has a lot of inconvenience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a