Thanks! Can you link here the upstream bug report and fix once it is
there?
What about the other PPDs that don't set a default resolution? I would
suppose that they suffer from the same problem if the printer supports more
than 300dpi.
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 02:29, gf <1385...@bugs.launchpad.net>
Using Ubuntu 16.04. I originally reported it when I was using 14.04, but
the PPD hasn't seen any changes in all those years and nobody from the
HPLIP developers looked at this bug (AFAIK).
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 14:11, gf <1385...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Hi Schlomo,
> Just to clarify and
Thanks. I checked the 3.18.7 PPDs and found out that the problem is still
not fixed. The root issue is that the PPD does not define the
DefaultResolution parameter which causes CUPS to use a default of 300dpi.
So the problem is that the
*DefaultResolution: 600x600dpi
line is still missing from
Can you please point me to the source repo of the PPD for this printer?
The bug is in the PPD which explicitly limits the resolution to 300dpi
even though the printer supports true 600dpi in hardware.
I haven't upgraded to 18.04 yet so that I can happily check the PPD in
your source code instead.
Can you please explain why you believe that the root cause is a hard
coded path in this extension? I unpacked the OXT and the embedded JAR
file and could not find any "libreoffice" string in any of the files
there. I could find all kind of other UI strings from the extension so
that I tend to
I am not sure that the installation location has any effect except for
those cases where people hard-code paths which I would not recommend in
any case.
This bug is more about setting the correct library path to match the
installation choice taken by the LO Ubuntu flavor.
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
I try to use the "E-Porto Add In" (extension to insert a stamp for the
German postal system) from https://www.deutschepost.de/de/i
/internetmarke-porto-drucken/e-porto-add-in.html on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64.
The extension contains several XCU and one JAR:
Are you sure? The main difference I found between the main and the
partner repo was the lack of the dep11 stuff.
Who can add this information to the partner repo?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
Do you mean the Component files like in
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/dep11/?
Yes, the partner repo lacks those. How can we get the attention of the
maintainer of the partner repo?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
It seems like Ubuntu-Software cannot install any package from the Ubuntu
partner repo. I checked with Skype and google-cloud-sdk (see
Screenshot).
Any news on getting a fix?
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing apt with Skype and ubuntu-software
without Skype"
** Summary changed:
- I can't install flashplayer through the Ubuntu Software.
+ Cannot install packages from Ubuntu partner repo in Ubuntu-Software
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
A year has passed - what do I need to do to get this PPD fix upstream?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055
Title:
HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP prints in 300dpi
See http://blog.schlomo.schapiro.org/2015/01/ppd-pimp-your-printer-
driver.html, I don't know how to get my fix upstream :-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385055
Title:
I tried my best - first time doing this on Launchpad so please forgive
if I am doing it the wrong way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100
Title:
guest user not
It would be nice to see the fix in vivid and utopic, if possible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100
Title:
guest user not removed after guest session ends
This patch renames the variables in the remove part of the script so
that they cannot conflict with reserved Bash variables
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411100
Sorry, this is the real patch.
** Patch added: Patch to use non-conflicting variable names
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1411100/+attachment/4298811/+files/guest-account_variable_names.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Public bug reported:
The /usr/sbin/giest-account script contains a bug which prevents the
removal of guest accounts:
$ sudo /usr/sbin/guest-account remove guest-Hhiook
/usr/sbin/guest-account: line 129: UID: readonly variable
Maybe this is related to /bin/sh actually beeing a Bash:
$ ll -d
Public bug reported:
OS:
XUbuntu 14.10 amd64 with all updates installed.
Scenario:
Using a multiseat setup with 2 graphics cards.
Problem:
User on non-primary seat (seat-1) uses xscreensaver to lock screen
(light-locker not working correctly). When the screen is in power saving mode
lightdm
** Also affects: light-locker (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in
Public bug reported:
Running Ubuntu 14.04 running stock hplip 3.14.3
Printer HP Officejet Pro X476dw MFP
hp-check -t output is attached
Problem:
Initially I noticed that printing documents with Hebrew fonts results in
low quality with fuzzy lines. After some debugging I was able to trace
this
The attached PDF looks very bad when printed in 300dpi and looks good
when printed in 600dpi. Somehow this font makes the problem very
visible, with latin fonts the difference in quality was less profound.
In 300dpi the lines of the letters look ragged and not crisp.
** Attachment added: test
I get exactly the same behaviour! Please fix this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1340435
Title:
Setting page-set=even and duplex=none results in filter failure
Really nice that the LTS Ubuntu does not support NTP any more ...
manually installing ntp helped, but it should be simpler than that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu.
3 months and nothing happens? Please fix the init script of cups. Some
people don't want to be forced to run avahi!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242185
Title:
25 matches
Mail list logo
