My wife points out that the appropriate way to report a regression in
this SRU is to file the regression bug using the appropriate emoji.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package fonts-noto-color-emoji -
0~20180810-0ubuntu1
---
fonts-noto-color-emoji (0~20180810-0ubuntu1) bionic; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1788256)
- This major update introduces support for the new Unicode 11 standard
-- Jeremy Bicha
I tried with fonts-noto-color-emoji 0~20180810-0ubuntu1 from bionic-
proposed and the new emojis are rendered correctly in the webbrowser and
in a terminal and aren't with previous version of the font installed.
Marking as verification-done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/fonts-noto-color-emoji/0~20180810-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Re-uploaded with the suggested change from comment 6.
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu.
Since the small-metrics thing is switchable, it seems that we could
entirely bypass the question of whether it might cause regressions by
changing debian/rules to pass SMALL_METRICS= to the make invocation?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in
Small glyphs (continued)
I asked. Is this sufficient?
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/issues/233
** Bug watch added: github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/issues #233
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/issues/233
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji
emoji_aliases.txt removal
-
In the previous version, Google used the "family: man, woman, boy" emoji to
represent the generic "family" emoji. In this version, Google created a unique
emoji to represent the "family" emoji. The justification is that all 3 people
in the new
The debdiff for this upload includes changes e.g. to fonts-noto-color-
emoji-0~20180810/emoji_aliases.txt that change existing behavior:
-1f46a;1f468_200d_1f469_200d_1f466 # FAMILY -> family: man, woman, boy
The Makefile has started to pass a -S "small metrics" flag to
emoji_builder.py that was
** Description changed:
Impact
==
Google has released the latest version of their color emoji font that is
shipped with Android 9 "Pie".
The new release is a major upgrade, including support for the new Unicode 11
standard. Some existing emoji were tweaked.
We need this update
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bicha (jbicha)
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bicha (jbicha)
** Description changed:
Impact
==
Google has released the latest version of
This bug was fixed in the package fonts-noto-color-emoji - 0~20180810-1
---
fonts-noto-color-emoji (0~20180810-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1788256)
- This major update introduces support for the new Unicode 11 standard
-- Jeremy Bicha Tue, 21
** Description changed:
Impact
==
Google has released the latest version of their color emoji font that is
shipped with Android 9 "Pie".
The new release is a major upgrade, including support for the new Unicode 11
standard. Some existing emoji were tweaked.
We need this update
14 matches
Mail list logo
