[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1839716 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839716 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1838154 Something hinders XFCE performance. >:] ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1839716 There is infinite loop in address bar /\&/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Confirmed Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b Edit: if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance doesn't degrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be significant performance, at least in terms of idle power. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1838154 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838154 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1838154 Simply snapping terminal window from the outside the screen fixes thermal build up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Confirmed Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b Edit: if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance doesn't degrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be significant performance, at least in terms of idle power. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1744930 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744930 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Confirmed Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b Edit: if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance doesn't degrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be significant performance, at least in terms of idle power. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
Launchpad has imported 29 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740095. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. On 2019-08-12T09:49:58+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Description of problem: Anywhere where you need to travel to previous view performance drops visibly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to previous view 2. 3. Actual results: Performance starts to degrade. Expected results: Performance is like before. :)) Additional info: Documents Documents/a Documents< performance degrades (workaround go anywhere else besides Documents or Documents/.. and only then go to Documents) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/3 On 2019-08-12T10:18:04+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1729681 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/4 On 2019-08-14T09:35:53+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Think the only obvious so-called workaround is avoiding getting into previous through whatever means possible. This way you can keep it on the level. :-) Simple rule is: previous view ? skip to something else :)) >:] Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/6 On 2019-08-14T14:39:35+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1670504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/7 On 2019-08-16T17:08:32+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to klfyt from comment #2) > Think the only obvious so-called workaround is avoiding > getting into previous through whatever means possible. > > This way you can keep it on the level. :-) > > Simple rule is: > previous view ? skip to something else :)) > > >:] a > b b == previous? b > c > b Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/9 On 2019-08-28T18:52:39+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Fastest xfmw alt tab > shift alt tab > alt tab Fastest browser (Firefox, Chromium) shift ctrl tab > ctrl tab Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/12 On 2019-08-29T08:05:37+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Fastest text :-) navigate left -1 letter keep typing. For example: Good m|f Good morning|f Good morning. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/13 On 2019-08-29T08:10:14+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1744930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/14 On 2019-08-29T08:10:41+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1724029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/15 On 2019-08-29T08:12:30+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1677161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/16 On 2019-08-29T08:12:56+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1674486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/17 On 2019-08-29T08:13:22+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1733819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/18 On 2019-08-29T08:13:43+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** Bug 1729666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/comments/19 On 2019-08-29T08:14:06+00:00 fakenxid wrote:
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
No answer yet to seb128's prior question. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b Edit: if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance doesn't degrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be significant performance, at least in terms of idle power. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Description changed: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) - - # for example if you skip to previous + # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b + + + Edit: + if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance + doesn't degrade + https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 + + It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be + significant performance, at least in terms + of idle power. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b Edit: if you skip to previous view with Shift key performance doesn't degrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 It's ignored at the moment, however it looks to be significant performance, at least in terms of idle power. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 :-) lol? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Description changed: - Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) + + + # for example if you skip to previous + # a > b (previous) fix it with + # b > c > b -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c > b To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
Maybe previous view contains recursive function that keeps fighting for resources? :)) ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Linux: New Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Also affects: xfwm4 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu ** Also affects: xorg-server Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Xfwm4: New Status in X.Org X server: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Also affects: nautilus Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: xfwm4 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: nautilus ** Project changed: xfwm4 => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade
** Summary changed: - If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance + Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade ** Description changed: - If you travel directly to location there you have been - with BACK command (alt left) for example then - scrolling seems to get worse. This is fixable - if you revisit recent files in a new window (ctrl n) - and close it (ctrl w). - - BACK? > open recent files in a new window and close it + Something is wrong with previous view + killing performance and responsiveness, etc. + The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Status in nautilus package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1839610/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp