@Eduard: please attach the output of the following command:
lspci -n
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1262238
Title:
[SRU] Add support for the lts-saucy stack
The device in question is 01:05.0 0300: 1002:9712
** Attachment added: output of lcpci -n
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1262238/+attachment/3973713/+files/lspci-n.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
Apparently both the fglrx and the fglrx-updates package support your
card. I suggest that you remove fglrx-experimental-13 and install fglrx-
updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
I don't have fglrx-experimental-13 installed. According to apt-cache
show fglrx-updates the current version is 2:13.125-0ubuntu0.0.1.
Interestingly it shows also the older version 2:8.960-0ubuntu1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
I've just checked AMD's website, and it seems that they support your
card only in their legacy driver which, however, doesn't support new
xservers.
http://support.amd.com/en-
us/download/desktop/legacy?product=Legacy2os=Linux%20x86_64
That driver should work well with the kernel (Linux 3.2) and
I am on ubuntu 12.04.04 LTS. This update causes a severe regression for
me. The [AMD/ATI] RS880M [Mobility Radeon HD 4225/4250] is not
supported by the fglrx version 13 driver!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
This bug was fixed in the package fglrx-installer-experimental-13 -
2:13.300-0ubuntu0.0.1
---
fglrx-installer-experimental-13 (2:13.300-0ubuntu0.0.1) precise-proposed;
urgency=low
* New upstream release (LP: #1272311):
- Added support for the following products:
AMD
This bug was fixed in the package fglrx-installer -
2:13.101-0ubuntu0.0.1
---
fglrx-installer (2:13.101-0ubuntu0.0.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
- Add support for AMD A10, A8, A6, and A4 Series APUs.
- Add GLX_EXT_buffer_age extension support.
This bug was fixed in the package fglrx-installer-updates -
2:13.125-0ubuntu0.0.1
---
fglrx-installer-updates (2:13.125-0ubuntu0.0.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
- Add support for AMD A10, A8, A6, and A4 Series APUs.
- Add GLX_EXT_buffer_age
all the drivers build and work correctly here:
:~$ dkms status
fglrx, 13.101, 3.11.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed
:~$ dkms status
fglrx-updates, 13.125, 3.11.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed
:~$ dkms status
fglrx-experimental-13, 13.300, 3.11.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed
:~$ apt-cache
Precise will have newer version of fglrx-installer-updates than Saucy
after this change. Could you please update Saucy's package too? Please
see bug 1254442 for the SRU request. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fglrx-installer into precise-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-
installer/2:13.101-0ubuntu0.0.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fglrx-installer-experimental-13 into precise-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-
experimental-13/2:13.300-0ubuntu0.0.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/fglrx-installer-updates
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/fglrx-installer
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/fglrx-installer-
experimental-13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
** Description changed:
SRU request:
Please accept fglrx and fglrx-updates into precise-proposed.
[Rationale]
The packages need to be compatible with the lts-saucy stack in 12.04.4.
[Impact]
Without this work, the packages won't build against Linux 3.11 and won't be
15 matches
Mail list logo
