Any update on fixing GIO? Maybe we can already revert this hack?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296233
Title:
increase in number of wakeups in recent release in
** Changed in: indicator-datetime
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296233
Title:
increase in number of wakeups in recent
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-datetime -
13.10.0+14.04.20140328-0ubuntu1
---
indicator-datetime (13.10.0+14.04.20140328-0ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low
[ Charles Kerr ]
* Short-term workaround for the GIO GAppInfo wakeup bug discussed in
bug 1296233 (LP: #1296233)
** Changed in: indicator-datetime
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Charles Kerr (charlesk)
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
** Branch linked: lp:~charlesk/indicator-datetime/lp-1296233-workaround-
gio-wakeups
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296233
Title:
increase in number of wakeups in
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ryan Lortie (desrt)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
Adding Ryan for a second opinion since he's got his name as co-Author on
gdesktopappinfo.c ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296233
Title:
increase in number of
This is my fault indeed. I introduced the code that added this watch
without remembering that it does the wrong thing in the case of missing
directories. I think the correct fix here is to reevaluate our approach
to dealing with missing files in the inotify monitor...
--
You received this bug
8 matches
Mail list logo