Seth, this means then that this is an AppArmor bug and not a CUPS bug.
Moving ...
** Package changed: cups (Ubuntu) => apparmor (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
Jamie, note that we added /etc/ld.so.preload to in
the upstream project:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/master/revision/3497
It's a pity AppArmor SRUs take so much effort. :(
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
/etc/ld.so.preload should be a site-specific file (ie, it shouldn't come
from Ubuntu). I wouldn't want to break people by adding an explicit
deny, but I'd prefer users encountering this to update their
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.cupsd file to have:
/etc/ld.so.preload r,
Or if people just
OdyX, Jamie, Marc, should we simply allow cupsd accessing
/etc/ld.so.preload? Or are there any security reasons against it? If
there are reasons against it, how can we silence these messages?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
It happened after I installed ESET Node32.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571531
Title:
cupsd cause apparmor denials for /etc/ld.so.preload
Status in cups package in
Same here
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571531
Title:
cupsd cause apparmor denials for /etc/ld.so.preload
Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
** Summary changed:
- cupds cause apparmor denials for /etc/ld.so.preload
+ cupsd cause apparmor denials for /etc/ld.so.preload
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571531
7 matches
Mail list logo