[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2019-05-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: systemd Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2019-05-02 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nextcloud-snap Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: nextcloud-snap Importance: High => Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-07-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
127.0.0.53 stub resolver was only introduced in v231, thus there is nothing to fix in xenial. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-07-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Milestone: ubuntu-16.04.3 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 231-9ubuntu4 --- systemd (231-9ubuntu4) yakkety; urgency=medium * debian/extra/units/systemd-resolved.service.d/resolvconf.conf: if resolved is going to be started, make sure this blocks network-online.target. LP: #1673860. *

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Ubuntu Core 16 also uses resolved, so this bug also needs to be fixed in xenial. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Milestone: None =>

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Verified by way of a slightly modified test case: - boot a yakkety cloud image - verify 127.0.0.53 in /etc/resolv.conf - sudo sed -i -e's/resolve \[[^]]*\] //' /etc/nsswitch.conf - ping www.freedesktop.org -> FAIL - install systemd from -proposed - ping www.freedesktop.org -> SUCCESS **

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-17 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug report is about resolved not resolving CNAME records. If you are seeing issues with resolved and DNSSEC, please follow LP: #1682499 instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-16 Thread Eldar Khayrullin
The same issue as Sudeep Duggal say (Ubuntu 17.04 bug, Ubuntu 16.10 works fine). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-14 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Anders, this commit was pushed to stretch but not to zesty: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg- systemd/systemd.git/commit/?h=stretch=3361c8f55c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-14 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Martin, was the DNSSEC=allow-downgrade default not switched off for the 17.04 stable release like you said it would? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-14 Thread Sudeep Duggal
Hello, I did a clean install of the Ubuntu 17.04 release today. All websites were opening correctly in Chrome/Firefox using on a LAN connection. However, on WiFi, gmail/youtube are not opening in Chrome/Firefox. I am able to successfully ping both gmail and youtube. Other websites successfully

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-11 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Anders, or anyone else affected, Accepted systemd into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/231-9ubuntu4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-21 Thread Khurshid Alam
And the problem is back in next reboot. Not sure what is happening here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-21 Thread Khurshid Alam
Ah. Sorry. libnss-resolve was indeed the culprit. Removing it fixed the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-20 Thread Khurshid Alam
I don't know if this is related but now it simply could not resolve https://www.aviationweather.gov and www.noaa.gov. The result is the same through ping and wget. However when I try ip address of www.aviationweather.gov in browser it works.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: + [SRU Justification] + Ubuntu 16.10 server uses systemd-resolved by default, configured both as a DNS stub resolver on 127.0.0.53 and as an NSS module via libnss-resolved talking to the dbus service. The DNS stub resolver has a bug that causes it to fail to resolve

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-20 Thread Kyle Fazzari
** Changed in: nextcloud-snap Importance: Unknown => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-03-15 Thread Blaisorblade
Replying to #35: > So, I'm downgrading this from critical to high since it only hits users of > 16.10 server in a few corner cases (i.e. containers, chroots without > libnss-resolve installed). It should still be SRUed. Another corner case seems to be binaries linked against musl libc, since

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-25 Thread Andreas Lindhé
** Bug watch added: github.com/nextcloud/nextcloud-snap/issues #178 https://github.com/nextcloud/nextcloud-snap/issues/178 ** Also affects: nextcloud-snap via https://github.com/nextcloud/nextcloud-snap/issues/178 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-23 Thread Steve Langasek
I was reminded that libnss-resolve is in 'standard' now, which means it's also installed by default on server and any bugs that affect only the stub DNS resolver without affecting the dbus service - such as this one - do not impact DNS resolution by default on server in 16.10. (I was wondering

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-23 Thread Steve Langasek
As I recall resolved is also enabled by default in Ubuntu Server 16.10 (though not on Desktop), so this is a critical issue there as well. Dimitri, could you please have a look at this backport? Could someone who's seeing the DNSSEC problem please also file a separate bug report, so we can track

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-23 Thread Martin Pitt
Yes, there, see "man resolved.conf". But I'd recommend a separate file to avoid changing the package-provided conffile: sudo mkdir -p /etc/systemd/resolved.conf.d printf "[Resolve]\nDNSSEC=no\n" | sudo tee /etc/systemd/resolved.conf.d/no-dnssec.conf -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-23 Thread Simplehuman
#31, same problem also. As workaround for me - I just downgraded network-manager package to 1.4.4-1ubuntu1 . Downloaded it from here - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/1.4.4-1ubuntu1/ and then sudo dpkg -i network-manager_1.4.4-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb . And blocked this version

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-23 Thread Khurshid Alam
Same problem as Fred here. It worked before the cherry-picking back 98974a88 and 47c16e59. But now it's broken. And yes everything works with "DNSSEC supported: no". @Martin How do I disable DNSSEC? Through /etc/systemd/resolv.conf? And how to switch it off "DNSSEC=allow-downgrade" ? -- You

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Note: We keep DNSSEC=allow-downgrade during development to collect feedback, but switch it off for stable releases (we did so in yakkety and should do so again in zesty). So if you have some trouble which is DNSSEC related, it would be good to get a debug output of resolved while it's failing to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
I will say that I've noticed a delay in having the network come up too, but that predates the new network-manage, and the latest systemd. It's been going on for a while now but I haven't managed to report a bug on it yet. I have several startup apps configured in my Gnome environment, including

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Fred
So when I start my computer, then I cannot ping youtube.com, I start Chromium, I still cannot ping youtube.com, then I open Firefox, and boom magically everything worked! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Fred
Was chatting then I noticed my DNS had suddenly started working normally and YouTube resolved again. I ran systemd-resolve --status Under "Link 2 (eth0)" it said "DNSSEC supported: no". I then restarted the computer, and now the DNS is broken again. It now says "DNSSEC supported: yes". Minutes

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Fred
Steve, I am using 232-18ubuntu1. $ dpkg -l | grep systemd ii dbus-user-session 1.10.10-1ubuntu2 all simple interprocess messaging system (systemd --user integration) ii libnss-resolve:amd64 232-18ubuntu1

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Steve Langasek
André, Fred, are you both definitely running the newest version of systemd-resolved? You must be using the version from systemd 232-17ubuntu1, which just reached zesty yesterday. The resolved service *should* be automatically restarted when you upgrade the package. -- You received this bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
Interesting. It worked and works for me. I tested the version in my PPA, both outside and inside a chroot (it was the inside-chroot that was previously broken). I just dist-upgraded my other Zesty machine and rebooted, and I am having no troubles resolving both IP and domain names both on my

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread Fred
Barry, I think something went wrong. My DNS worked previously, but after the update it resolves google.com but not many other domains such as youtube.com. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread André
version 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 (from pre-release and from Barry's ppa) is not working correctly for me Can only ping any host by ip and never by hostname (google.com / sapo.pt) ** Attachment added: "Selection_00553.png"

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-17 Thread André
output of $ systemd-resolve --status ** Attachment added: "Selection_00554.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1647031/+attachment/4821012/+files/Selection_00554.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
I'll cherry pick back 98974a88 and 47c16359 now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 232-17ubuntu1 --- systemd (232-17ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium * debian/patches/0001-resolved-follow-CNAMES-for-DNS-stub- replies.patch: cherry-pick upstream fix for following CNAMEs in DNS stub replies. Closes LP: #1647031.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-02-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Fixed upstream: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/e8d23f92b50a97bb3 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.4.2-3ubuntu2 --- network-manager (1.4.2-3ubuntu2) zesty; urgency=medium * Revert 98974a88 and 47c16e59 (network-manager switching from dnsmasq to resolved) because of bugs in resolved's resolution of CNAME records. (LP:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
I've tested the PPA package and am satisfied that it restores CNAME resolution in schroots without any observed regression otherwise. I will upload it momentarily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
I've uploaded a version with the reverts to my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/experimental A local build looks promising, but I want to test it more before I upload it for real. Please do test the PPA version once it builds. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
As per pitti's email in #12, added network-manager bugtask and subscribed pitti. ** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: