[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1894224] Re: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags
Marking this as notfixing since it is not impacting users and should not be targeted for the release. ** Tags removed: rls-gg-incoming ** Tags added: rls-gg-notfixing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894224 Title: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: looking at least at the succeeding armhf build logs, optimization flags are picked up from different places, once injected from dpkg- buidflags, and then hard-coded in solenv/gbuild/platform/LINUX__GCC.mk These really should match. Or maybe disable the settings from solenv at all? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1894224] Re: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags
Thanks for the patch! I was looking at it and noticed that just a few lines from the bottom there's this: +export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP +export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_PREPEND DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_PREPEND +export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP Is that second +export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP necessary for some reason? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894224 Title: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: looking at least at the succeeding armhf build logs, optimization flags are picked up from different places, once injected from dpkg- buidflags, and then hard-coded in solenv/gbuild/platform/LINUX__GCC.mk These really should match. Or maybe disable the settings from solenv at all? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1894224] Re: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894224 Title: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: looking at least at the succeeding armhf build logs, optimization flags are picked up from different places, once injected from dpkg- buidflags, and then hard-coded in solenv/gbuild/platform/LINUX__GCC.mk These really should match. Or maybe disable the settings from solenv at all? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1894224] Re: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: rls-gg-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894224 Title: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: looking at least at the succeeding armhf build logs, optimization flags are picked up from different places, once injected from dpkg- buidflags, and then hard-coded in solenv/gbuild/platform/LINUX__GCC.mk These really should match. Or maybe disable the settings from solenv at all? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1894224] Re: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags
here is what needs to be changed for armhf and -O0. That patch needs generalization ** Patch added: "opt.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+attachment/5407658/+files/opt.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894224 Title: LO not built consistently with the same optimization flags Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: looking at least at the succeeding armhf build logs, optimization flags are picked up from different places, once injected from dpkg- buidflags, and then hard-coded in solenv/gbuild/platform/LINUX__GCC.mk These really should match. Or maybe disable the settings from solenv at all? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1894224/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
