[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Robert Ancell
Correct, this fix is valuable for core22, so kinetic was skipped. There should be no issues for anyone updating from jammy to kinetic. Though this will affect core20, we expect most snaps to be using core22 so no plan to backport it to focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.72.4-0ubuntu2 --- glib2.0 (2.72.4-0ubuntu2) jammy; urgency=medium * d/p/0001-gio-Make-portal-support-aware-of-snaps.patch: - Make portal support aware of snaps (LP: #1998267) -- Robert Ancell Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:52:13 +1300 **

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I verified that the test was executed according to the [test plan]. I understand kinetic is not part of this SRU. The reason wasn't explained anywhere, but I'm assuming it's because it's a) ending support soon; and/or b) this glib update is more useful for core22 snap and core desktop

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Robert Ancell
Yes, these specific steps performed in a core desktop VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of snap confinement Status in glib2.0 package

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Robert, the [test plan] has very specific steps involving the calculator, gsettings, and an expected result. Did you perform those specifically? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-19 Thread Robert Ancell
I tested a standard jammy desktop in a VM by running various apps including calculator to confirm they were still working (i.e. looking for regressions). I tested the core desktop behaviour by building the core22-desktop snap from https://github.com/canonical/core-base-desktop/ (locally modified

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-19 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks. I agree and I've added a hint. This should hopefully clear the flag on the next (Jammy) britney run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-19 Thread Robie Basak
In the meantime, please could you confirm what [sorry, that's ambiguous; I mean *how*] you tested? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-17 Thread Robert Ancell
Tested glib2.0 2.72.4-0ubuntu2 in a jammy VM and working. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-17 Thread Robert Ancell
I've looked at the autopkgtests and the failures don't seem to be related to this change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of snap

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-04 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
Hello Robert, or anyone else affected, Accepted glib2.0 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.72.4-0ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of snap confinement Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [ Impact] glib is not aware of snap confinement and this causes the internal logic to decide when to use portals to not work as designed. One important case is the gsettings backend, which should use a keyfile when confined rather than using dconf. When using

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-03-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The upstream PR has been merged and we got the new glib serie in Lunar so assuming it's fixed there ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Lunar) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2022-11-29 Thread Robert Ancell
Targeting 22.04 so this can become part of the core22 snap fixing the issue for most modern snaps. ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: