No problem, Simon, thank you for responding and sponsoring!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039460
Title:
Please merge network-manager-applet 1.34.0-1
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager-applet -
1.34.0-1ubuntu1
---
network-manager-applet (1.34.0-1ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium
* Resynchronize on Debian, remaining changes (LP: #2039460):
- d/control:
+ Build-Depend on on dh-sequence-translations
+
By the way...
> Should I always propose the debdiff with the release name instead of
UNRELEASED[...]?
Yes, that's correct. Great question, sorry that I missed it!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet
This is just a minor note, but "resynchronize" implies a pure sync,
merging is slightly different. Not blocking the sponsorship request.
Sponsoring, thank you!
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Thanks for having a look, Bryce.
I addressed your points; the build is [2].
Should I always propose the debdiff with the release name instead of
UNRELEASED even though it is unreleased at that given point? I'm used
not to, but maybe that's something particular of Gnome[1].
[1]
Hi Nathan,
In your changelog entry, it shows 'UNRELEASED' as the distro, but that should
be 'noble' now.
It would also be worthwhile to mention this bug # in the changelog, so it
should look like:
+network-manager-applet (1.34.0-1ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium
+
+ * Merge with Debian (LP:
The attachment "nma.diff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors
team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and
hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please
remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and
if you are
7 matches
Mail list logo
