If you install the Ubuntu Light font in Windows, and use it in say,
Excel, the bug is very evident, as it renders as a bolded Ubuntu font
natively.
I have seen the same behavior in Ubuntu itself, though it is less
reproducible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of De
Aside from the chromium upstream bug
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=627143), I'm not
seeing any issue with the rendering of Ubuntu Light:
- libreoffice renders text correctly when using the Ubuntu font and setting
the character style to light
- firefox and epiphany (web)
Any further progress on this? Why have a bug reporter if bugs are going
to sit out here forever unresolved. This is a definite issue with the
metadata in the fonts. Easily fixable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromi
** No longer affects: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu Wily)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"
Status in
** Package changed: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) => fonts-ubuntu
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu Light" font has heavier
Downloaded ubuntu-font-family-0.83 from design.ubuntu.com/font.
This bug also affects me on Debian 9.
If I remove Ubuntu Medium, Ubuntu Light renders properly in LibreOffice.
Also, Microsoft Windows displays Ubuntu Medium's font name as "Ubuntu
Light."
--
You received this bug notification bec
This is upstream bug
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=627143
(see also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287089#c1)
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1287089
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287089
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
According to https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-3/#src-desc:
« When authors would prefer to use a locally available copy of a given font and
download it if it’s not, local() can be used. The locally-installed
argument to local() is a format-specific string that uniquely
identifies a single fon
Ahoy Paul!
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:29:46PM -, Paul Sladen wrote:
> The valid CSS would be:
>
> font-weight: lighter;
>
> In the case of explicitly wanting "Ubuntu Light", once everything is
> fixed, the CSS access will hopefully be just:
>
> font-family: "Ubuntu";
> font-weight: 30
The valid CSS would be:
font-weight: lighter;
In the case of explicitly wanting "Ubuntu Light", once everything is
fixed, the CSS access will hopefully be just:
font-family: "Ubuntu";
font-weight: 300;
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, wh
I think you can define a font family like in the attached file - which
I've eliminated the Google fonts from, so we're only using the files
shipped in Ubuntu. This file renders "as expected" in epiphany (webkit)
and Firefox, but not in Chromium (as is the case for the previous
example given).
It
11 matches
Mail list logo
