Review Request 22403: ACCUMULO-2787 Tune max open file recommendation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22403/ --- Review request for accumulo. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2787 https://issues.apache.org/

Re: Review Request 22399: ACCUMULO-2876 - use site config for default VolumeManagerImpl

> On June 9, 2014, 4:59 p.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > Please make a follow-on for making Property.GENERAL_VOLUME_CHOOSER a fixed > > property since you didn't make that change here. Thanks. Will do. /me presses Publish. :) - Bill --- Th

Re: Review Request 22399: ACCUMULO-2876 - use site config for default VolumeManagerImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22399/#review45139 --- Ship it! Please make a follow-on for making Property.GENERAL_VOLUME

Re: Review Request 22399: ACCUMULO-2876 - use site config for default VolumeManagerImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22399/#review45135 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Eric Newton On June 9, 2014, 8:47 p.m., Bill

Review Request 22399: ACCUMULO-2876 - use site config for default VolumeManagerImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22399/ --- Review request for accumulo, Eric Newton and Josh Elser. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2876

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

+1 on the Ganglia integration. Also, while we're on the topic of github projects for integrating with Accumulo, I'd like to see Accuismus worked on as well. https://github.com/keith-turner/Accismus On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Alex Moundalexis wrote: > I would love to see metrics2 from Had

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I would love to see metrics2 from Hadoop Common implemented. Easier Ganglia integration without the use of JMX and conversion utilities. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1817 I knew I remembered an issue being open. :) On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Tamburello, Paul [USA] < tambu

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I'd love to help folks to work on Kite SDK/Accumulo integration: https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/CDK-220 -Joey On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:44 PM, David Medinets wrote: > I've been researching docker in the hopes of understanding enough to get a > Dockerized Accumulo instance running. > > > On

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I really like the idea of pulling the tests into a docker image. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > I've seen a few examples of starting up a Hadoop cluster that would > probably serve as a good building block. > > Ideally, I suppose it would be good to get a common-base (witho

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I've seen a few examples of starting up a Hadoop cluster that would probably serve as a good building block. Ideally, I suppose it would be good to get a common-base (without any craziness going on) and start building up other types of containers that do all sorts of things (configured to run

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I've been researching docker in the hopes of understanding enough to get a Dockerized Accumulo instance running. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > A couple of things that come to mind, mostly things that I have wanted to > use/extend/play-with > > * JIRA is a great source (lik

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

A couple of things that come to mind, mostly things that I have wanted to use/extend/play-with * JIRA is a great source (like Bill H pointed out) * Cascading+Accumulo integration https://github.com/airawat/cascading.accumulo * Harness for deploying an Accumulo "cluster" via Docker and/or Vagran

Re: Documentation not correct for "Reading Data".

It is hard to believe such misses, anyway good to see it getting resolved quickly. Looks like users are not reading the document other than from me ;( Thanks, Vicky On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Christopher wrote: > The documentation is wrong. It should be fetchColumnFamily. Thanks for > cat

Re: Has anyone looked at Nifty?

mmm, those sentiments about Netty are what caused me to ask as well. On 6/9/14, 10:28 AM, Eric Newton wrote: I looked at Nifty briefly last year because everyone kept saying nice things about Netty, and it already supported SSL connectivity. On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Josh Elser wrote:

Re: Has anyone looked at Nifty?

I looked at Nifty briefly last year because everyone kept saying nice things about Netty, and it already supported SSL connectivity. On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > https://github.com/facebook/nifty > > "Nifty is an implementation of Thrift clients and servers on Netty." >

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

You may have already picked up on these sorts of tickets, but one place to start looking is our list of open "newbie" tickets. https://s.apache.org/newbie-accumulo As I was starting out I also would find good tickets to work under the Trivial priority: https://s.apache.org/trivial-accumulo Bill

Re: Review Request 21639: ACCUMULO-2808 Update to Jetty 9

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21639/#review45075 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Bill Havanki On May 19, 2014, 1:31 p.m., Chr

Re: Documentation not correct for "Reading Data".

The documentation is wrong. It should be fetchColumnFamily. Thanks for catching that. The getRow() should return return a Text object. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2875 -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Vicky Kak wrote: >

Re: Documentation not correct for "Reading Data".

I've created ACCUMULO-2874 . -Eric On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Vicky Kak wrote: > The following piece also looks crazy > > for(Entry entry : scan) { > String row = entry.getKey().getRow(); > Value value = entry.getValue(); > } >

Re: Documentation not correct for "Reading Data".

The following piece also looks crazy for(Entry entry : scan) { String row = entry.getKey().getRow(); Value value = entry.getValue(); } On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Vicky Kak wrote: > I have been looking at the "Reading Data" section here > http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/accumulo_us

Documentation not correct for "Reading Data".

I have been looking at the "Reading Data" section here http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/accumulo_user_manual.html#_reading_data Looking at the code I don't see the fetchFamily method as mentioned in this line scan.fetchFamily("attributes"); Looks to me that the document is not updated or something