---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26153/#review55209
---
Ship it!
On Oct. 2, 2014, 3:49 p.m., kturner wrote:
test/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/MissingWalHeaderCompletesRecoveryIT.java,
line 75
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26153/diff/3-4/?file=709899#file709899line75
This is funny. Was this something you only saw after switching to
FYI, I just enabled a new Jenkins job that should see any pull-requests
opened against http://github.com/apache/accumulo, build it, and share
the results.
* https://builds.apache.org/job/Accumulo%20Pull%20Requests/
* https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/github_pull_request_builds_now
Feel
I was a looking at the new Accumulo powered logo [1] and thought that just
an A[2] may be better. Any other thoughts on how to improve this?
Someone mentioned that just the A[2] isn't as informative in the case where
someone is completely unfamiliar w/ Accumulo.
[1]:
I think a logo that's more friendly to place in a circle would be useful.
The Accumulo logo is very squared off.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Yea, as an outside observer, I would have no idea what Apache A is, nor
any idea how to get more information.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Yea, as an outside observer, I would have no idea what Apache A is, nor
any idea how to get more information. Maybe we just need a different logo,
One mitigating factor, is that if anyone used the logo on a web site I
think
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Yea, as an outside observer, I would have no idea what Apache A is, nor
any idea how to get more information. Maybe we just need a different logo,
altogether, given the context of putting it in the PBA circle.
Another
I would argue that the a logo is one of our official logos. It is in use
as the favicon of the Accumulo monitor page, and on our Twitter account.
On Oct 2, 2014 3:49 PM, Keith Turner ke...@deenlo.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Yea, as an
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would argue that the a logo is one of our official logos. It is in use
as the favicon of the Accumulo monitor page, and on our Twitter account.
ok. In that case the a by itself may be a better choice w/ for the
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
I like the one with just the 'a', but I think we could make ~50% bigger.
I agree.
Adam
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Billie Rinaldi billie.rina...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would argue that the a logo is one of our
(also, thank you for making the changes, don't want to appear snippy)
Josh Elser wrote:
Should we have a JDK 1.6 build against the 1.6 branch to catch things
like JDK7 only constructs? I'm not entirely sure if that's possible with
the new plugin or not.
Christopher wrote:
I bumped the JDK
Nah, the maven-compiler-plugin configuration passes -source 1.6 -target 1.6
to javac, which will catch 99% of that. There's a few compile-time type
safety stuff with generics that it won't catch, but these are fringe cases
that are easily caught and fixed, so I don't think it's worth having two
I'm not worried about this Jenkins job. I doubt this will introduce
significant spam. I'm more worried about the spam from comments on pull
requests/reviews on pull requests that might discourage pull requests in
general, and reduce the likelihood of this Jenkins job getting much use.
But, that's
13 matches
Mail list logo
