+1 for EOL of 1.5 with the release of 1.5.3
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:18 PM
To: Accumulo Dev List
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] EOL 1.5
So, at this point, I'm willing to do a 1.5.3 release and can start that today.
It
+1 Seems like no one is pushing for a longer lifetime for 1.5. 1.5.3
makes sense.
Eric Newton wrote:
+1 for EOL for 1.5.
Making fixes in 1.5 and then merging it to 1.6, 1.7, and then master is
tedious work. 1.5 makes the task more challenging because the layout of the
packages changed so much
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
@busbey, just a slight clarification to the plan you describe in the
thread on the user@ list:
Since we'd actually be releasing the latest from 1.5 development
branch, there won't be any extra dangling unreleased commits
@busbey, just a slight clarification to the plan you describe in the
thread on the user@ list:
Since we'd actually be releasing the latest from 1.5 development
branch, there won't be any extra dangling unreleased commits to tag
like we did for 1.4-development-closed, so there won't be anything
to
Thank you all for the welcome.
I am a software developer and for the last few years I have been straddling
development and operational responsibilities for clusters with Accumulo being a
key component. My interests include enhancing Accumulo's metrics and monitoring
capabilities.
I'm really
+1 for 1.5 EOL
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
How do we want to EOL 1.5?
Personally, I was thinking (soon after 1.7.0 is released):
* Release and tag 1.5.3
* Remove 1.5 branch to focus active development on newer versions
* Be willing to branch from
yay consensus! I'll email user@
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Ed Coleman d...@etcoleman.com wrote:
+1 for EOL of 1.5 with the release of 1.5.3
-Original Message-
From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:18 PM
To: Accumulo Dev List
Subject:
So, at this point, I'm willing to do a 1.5.3 release and can start
that today. It seems we're in agreement we should at least do that.
Beyond that, I'm not really sure what the consensus is.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Josh Elser
I know Corey volunteered, but I'd like to get started today releasing
1.6.3. So, if there's no objection in the next hour or so, I'm just
going to move forward and produce an rc0 test release (no voting
necessary, as it won't be released, but testing is welcome).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
+1 for EOL for 1.5.
Making fixes in 1.5 and then merging it to 1.6, 1.7, and then master is
tedious work. 1.5 makes the task more challenging because the layout of the
packages changed so much in 1.6.
-Eric
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
So, at this
10 matches
Mail list logo
