Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 2.0.0-alpha-1-rc1

+1 Verified all hashes Ran unit tests successfully Ran ITs successfully except for certain timeouts (common for my laptop) Installed and tested basic capability using Fluo-uno On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 3:27 PM Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > I made some update to the 2.0.0 WIP release notes to

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.2 (Critical Bug Fixes)

+1 On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Christopher wrote: > > The following is a DRAFT announcement for the 1.9.2 release. Please > review > > and provide feedback. My intent is to publish on Friday. > > * > > > > The Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.2-rc2

+1 Verified signatures Ran ITs and unit tests Built from source tarball. Using built instance, installed using Uno, exercising various commands and tasks via the shell. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Christopher wrote: > Just published draft release notes for both 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 (to get

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft release timeline for 2.0.0

I'd like to get ACCUMULO-4808 into 2.0. I think I should be able to make the proposed deadline. On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Based on that, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4733 is the > only thing outstanding (and just one question at that). > > Mid/late

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 * verified hashes and signature * build passed mvn clean verify -Psunny * build passed all unit testing * ran an accumulo instance using Uno * verified basic functionality via the accumulo shell command On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > I am strongly

Re[2]: Welcome Mark Owens (new committer)

Thanks everyone! Looking forward to continued contributions to the project! -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Miller" To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Sent: 3/23/2018 10:56:50 AM Subject: Re: Welcome Mark Owens (new committer) Congrats and welcome! On Thu, Mar 22,

Re[2]: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc1

I know that Christopher has been looking into the KerberosRenewalIT failures. Has anyone been having any additional issues with the Kerberos IT tests? I have been unsuccessful in getting through any of the four Kerberos related ITs. I've attempted to run each of the four Kerberos-related

Re[2]: [VOTE] Switch to GitHub issues

+1 (non-binding)

Re[2]: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

Mike, I had that failure as well when running mvn verify. But when I ran the IT test by itself it completed successfully. I had several IT tests fail (different ones each run) during the 'mvn verify' runs, but when run in isolation they succeeded. The exception to that was the

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed formatter change: 100 char lines

I would be in favor of this change. As my eyes continue to get weaker, I have to use larger fonts resulting in a lot of the code being off the screen. The constant need to scroll horizontally can get irritating. -- Original Message -- From: "Christopher" To:

Broken test

I cloned the latest version of Accumulo a couple of hours ago and attempted to build it along with running the standard test suite, i.e., mvn clean package -Passemble. The build failed due to an error in the TableLoadBalancerTest class: Failed tests: TableLoadBalancerTest.test:188

Re[2]: review board

ommitter waiting for someone else to take a look before pushing it. Low-volume and decent test coverage helps make this a tenable process. On 11/1/17 12:28 PM, J. Mark Owens wrote: Hi, I'm going through a lot of the Accumulo documentation as I look at ACCUMULO-4714 and had a que

review board

Hi, I'm going through a lot of the Accumulo documentation as I look at ACCUMULO-4714 and had a question about some of the information. Is the review board documentation page still up to date and accurate? I clicked the instance link (https://reviews.apache.org/ ) and noticed that the last

Jekyll issues

Hi, I recently updated the documentation for the user manual in the accumulo-website repo. I was attempting to verify the changes using the instructions at https://accumulo.apache.org/contributor/source. But I'm having some issue getting things to work correctly. When running the command:

ACCUMULO-4561

Hi, I added a comment on the behavior documented in ACCUMULO-4561. I was hoping someone could take a look and offer comments and/or suggestions on how work on this ticket should proceed. Thanks, Mark

Re[2]: apache/accumulo-testing compile errors

to make sure there wasn't anything I missed. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:28 AM, J. Mark Owens <jmark...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I cloned the apache/accumulo-testing repo this morning. When attempting to run some of the tests I ran into compilation errors. Are there known issues with compil

Re[3]: apache/accumulo-testing compile errors

Correction - Is there a ticket to add the changes from ACCUMULO-3238 (not 3239) into the testing repo? -- Original Message -- From: "J. Mark Owens" <jmark...@gmail.com> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Sent: 10/5/2017 11:06:47 AM Subject: Re[2]: apache/accumulo-testin

apache/accumulo-testing compile errors

Hi, I cloned the apache/accumulo-testing repo this morning. When attempting to run some of the tests I ran into compilation errors. Are there known issues with compiling the accumulo-tests straight from the repo? I'm using version 1.8 of Java. A sample of the output is included below: [ERROR]

Re[2]: Assign myself to work ACCUMULO-2907

jmark99 -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Drob" <md...@apache.org> To: "Accumulo Dev List" <dev@accumulo.apache.org> Sent: 9/18/2017 4:33:10 PM Subject: Re: Assign myself to work ACCUMULO-2907 What is your apache jira id? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017

Re: Assign myself to work ACCUMULO-2907

create an > account on Apache Jira. After you create an account, you should be able to > assign yourself to an Accumulo issue. If not, email the list again someone > can enable access. > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:14 PM J. Mark Owens <jmark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi,

Assign myself to work ACCUMULO-2907

Hi, I'd like to assign myself to work on ACCUMULO-2907 . Could I be granted access to Accumulo Jira in order to assign the ticket to myself? Thanks, Mark Owens