A passing thought, but when we get to "real" bug fix releases, I'd like to
see the testing burden reduced. If there's only bug fixes, we need only
test that those are fixed and don't need to hold ourselves to the week of
testing IMO.
Hopefully unit and integration tests would be sufficient, but I
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Christopher wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > I know this got very long, especially for a Friday. Please bear with me.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> You seem to keep insisting that
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> I know this got very long, especially for a Friday. Please bear with me.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
>
>> You seem to keep insisting that we don't have consensus on basic API
>>
>> guarantees. I don't think tha
I know this got very long, especially for a Friday. Please bear with me.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Christopher wrote:
> You seem to keep insisting that we don't have consensus on basic API
>
> guarantees. I don't think that's true. We may not have a complete
> policy, but I think we hav
As long as v1.4.2 client code is compatible with all subsequent releases, I
foresee no problems. Or write a 1.4.2 to 1.X.X proxy layer.
*this is a poe*
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Christopher wrote:
> That's a fair point, but the main point I was trying to make using
> that example was
That's a fair point, but the main point I was trying to make using
that example was that there are concrete efforts which have been made
to inch closer to better compatibility guarantees, and
compatibility... specifically within a supported release line... is
something that we routinely consider an
For a little bit of historical context - when filing ACCUMULO-751 to ask
for wire compatibility, I had no intention of providing both forward and
backwards compatibility. I really wanted the ability to do rolling upgrades
where I could upgrade tablet servers one-by-one and not have suffer any
clust
Sean comment on ACCUMULO-2343:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2343?focusedCommentId=13973504&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13973504
I was going to comment in IRC or in response in JIRA, but I think this
would better serve the group to
