Thanks Keith!. Josh deserves credit for the release notes.
We'll publish the site and I'll get the announcement together.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 ditto. Mirrors appear updated as well. I just fixed another
s/1.6.1/1.6.2/ on the sidebar. I
Corey thanks for doing this release. I took a look at the release notes on
staging, looks good.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Corey Nolet cjno...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
Branch: 1.6.2-rc5
SHA1:
+1 ditto. Mirrors appear updated as well. I just fixed another
s/1.6.1/1.6.2/ on the sidebar. I think we're all good.
Keith Turner wrote:
Corey thanks for doing this release. I took a look at the release notes on
staging, looks good.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Corey
Josh- I'm terribly busy this weekend but I am going to tackle the release
notes, publishing the artifacts to the website, and javadocs tomorrow since
I'm off work. We'll need to get the manual out on the website. I can do
that tomorrow as well.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Josh Elser
Billie took on the user manual last time. I'm still not sure how to build
the website output for that.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Corey Nolet cjno...@gmail.com wrote:
Josh- I'm terribly busy this weekend but I am going to tackle the release
notes, publishing the artifacts to the website,
Great work, Corey!
What else do we need to do? Release notes? Do you have the
javadoc/artifact deployments under control?
Corey Nolet wrote:
The vote is now closed. The release of Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5 has been
accepted with 3 +1's and 0 -1's.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Keith
The vote is now closed. The release of Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5 has been
accepted with 3 +1's and 0 -1's.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Keith Turner ke...@deenlo.com wrote:
+1
I was able to build Fluo against RC5 w/ no problem. Also I determined
ACCUMULO-3597 is not new in 1.6.2.
Thanks Josh for your verification. Just a reminder that this vote closes in
6.5 hours.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Josh Elser els...@apache.org wrote:
+1
* Verified all changes over RC4 are present
* Hashes/sigs good
* ran from bin tarball
* built/tested from src tarball
* Verified
+1
I was able to build Fluo against RC5 w/ no problem. Also I determined
ACCUMULO-3597 is not new in 1.6.2.Because of ACCUMULO-3597, I was not
able to get a long randomwalk run. The bug happened shortly after
starting the test. I killed the deadlocked tserver and everything started
+1 to RC5.
I verified hashes/signatures are good, sources/javadoc jars available, jars
match lib directory of -bin.tar.gz, manifest files match specified SHA1
commit, source tarball matches specified SHA1 commit, and project builds.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On
With this being the fifth release candidate, I originally wanted to get the
vote closed before the weekend. Our bylaws do state that there's a 72-hour
minimum and a fifth release candidate shouldn't be an exception to that.
I'm going to extend the original vote closing time to be 72 hours after
+1
* Verified all changes over RC4 are present
* Hashes/sigs good
* ran from bin tarball
* built/tested from src tarball
* Verified NOTICE in native.tar.gz
Corey Nolet wrote:
Devs,
Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
Branch: 1.6.2-rc5
SHA1:
Devs,
Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
Branch: 1.6.2-rc5
SHA1: 42943a1817434f1f32e9f0224941aa2fff162e74
Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1024/
Source tarball:
13 matches
Mail list logo
