gmail.com>
>> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 1:38:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc4
>>
>> In case you want to see what changed between RC3 and RC4 you can use
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/com
+1
- verified git commit hash matches
- verified code builds and passes -Psunny tests with openjdk-1.8.0_101
- verified md5 of sha1 checksums of downloaded binary artifact match expected
- verified downloaded binary contains same files as local build
- - checked m5s sum of individual files in
I'd like to add info about sampling to the release notes. I can do
that Tue morning.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Michael Wall wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0.
>
> Git Commit:
>
+1
Verified sigs
Built Fluo and ran its ITs against staging repo
rfile-info was fixed, did anyone verify that multiple tservers still works?
Mike Wall looking at the diffs you linked too, I noticed that the fix
for the first seen dead gc issue also made it in to this RC. Thats a
nice bonus, I
+1 (binding)
* xsums/sigs good
* Can build from source
* Verified changes from rc3
* can run from binary tarball
* Verified `accumulo rfile-info` works
(assuming all verifications from previous
I'll try to spin up another cluster over the long weekend to do some
randomwalk testing, but I do
+1
* Manually inspected the diff and all looks as expected
* Verified SIGs and hashes
* Verified commit and branch match contents of src tarball
* Verified jars in staging repo match what's in bin tarball
* All ITs (periodic timeouts, as usual; work on retry) successfully (have
another run
In case you want to see what changed between RC3 and RC4 you can use
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/compare/1.8.0-rc3...1.8.0-rc4
or
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/compare/1.8.0-rc3...1.8.0-rc4.diff
Not planning to rerun the continuous integration tests based on these
changes.
Also,