[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-257 cleaning up dependencie...

GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/196 ARTEMIS-257 cleaning up dependencies on artemis-core-client You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] activemq pull request: AMQ-5931 Updated jodatime to 2.8.2

Github user czobrisky closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/150 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1 Non binding Ran some of the openwire examples that come with Artemis and look around the release. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > +1 > > I gave it a test with the master branch of Camel. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Christopher Shannon >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1 I gave it a test with the master branch of Camel. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and it's ready for a vote. This > release has 22 bug fixes and > improvements. > > The

RE: When send to Q big amount of prioritrized messages they done by wrong priority on consumer side.

Hi Jamie, According to last mail JVM size increase should not solve the issue with messages. Do you have any idea why I still fail on messages priority when send big amount ,but it not happen when in Q ~60-100 messages? Thanks Anna From: jgoodyear [via ActiveMQ]

[GitHub] activemq pull request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/151 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1 (non binding) Tested standalone and in Apache Karaf 4.0.2 using the jms commands Works all fine. Christian On 12.10.2015 20:33, Christopher Shannon wrote: Hello everyone, I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and it's ready for a vote. This release has 22 bug fixes and improvements.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1, ran CXF’s tests with it. Dan > On Oct 12, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Christopher Shannon > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and it's ready for a vote. This > release has 22 bug fixes and > improvements. > > The list of

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

On 12 October 2015 at 19:33, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and it's ready for a vote. This > release has 22 bug fixes and > improvements. > > The list of resolved issues is here: >

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-257 cleaning up dependencie...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/196 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1 binding On 10/12/2015 02:33 PM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and it's ready for a vote. This > release has 22 bug fixes and > improvements. > > The list of resolved issues is here: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1

+1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > +1, ran CXF’s tests with it. > > Dan > > > > > On Oct 12, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have cut the ActiveMQ 5.12.1 release and