[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #907: ARTEMIS-883 Fix OpenWire ProducerFlowControlTes...

Github user gaohoward commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/907 @clebertsuconic I'm looking at some regressions caused by this PR. pls don't merge now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm

About the packaging method... If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting the hands-on... For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help with the patterns. if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one is the best

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #937: ARTEMIS-896 remove 32 bits library

GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/937 ARTEMIS-896 remove 32 bits library You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis 32bit

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.3

+1 (binding) On 12/19/2016 10:49 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote: Hi Everyone, I have created the ActiveMQ 5.14.3 release and it's ready for a vote. This release contains 7 important fixes that didn't make it into the last release. The list of resolved issues is here:

Re: [DISCUSS] 32 bits compilation for Artemis libaio native

Alright.. thanks guys.. will remove it. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > +1 remove. Most of the embedded/low-power chips are all 64-bits now. I > can't imagine in a 32-bit use case that AIO would be significantly faster > than the Java NIO anyway. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.3

+1 On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have created the ActiveMQ 5.14.3 release and it's ready for a vote. > This release contains 7 important fixes that didn't make it into the > last release. > > The list of

Re: [DISCUSS] 32 bits compilation for Artemis libaio native

+1 remove. Most of the embedded/low-power chips are all 64-bits now. I can't imagine in a 32-bit use case that AIO would be significantly faster than the Java NIO anyway. On 12/19/16 10:27 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: Anyone aware for 32 bits still being widely used these days? I have a Déjà

Re: [DISCUSS] 32 bits compilation for Artemis libaio native

It would seem like a good time to remove it since we are bumping the major version in master anyways, especially if someone could compile it themselves if they really wanted it. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > Anyone aware for 32 bits still

[DISCUSS] 32 bits compilation for Artemis libaio native

Anyone aware for 32 bits still being widely used these days? I have a Déjà vu that I had already asked this... Any time I make a change to the native library on artemis, I have to remove the dust of a very old laptop just to compile the 32 bits library. I know I know, I could install an image

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, jgenender wrote: >> +1 >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >>

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.3

Hi Everyone, I have created the ActiveMQ 5.14.3 release and it's ready for a vote. This release contains 7 important fixes that didn't make it into the last release. The list of resolved issues is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12338822 You can

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 (non-binding) Cheers, Jamie On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, jgenender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-ActiveMQ-5-13-5-tp4720539p4720584.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 Jeff -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-ActiveMQ-5-13-5-tp4720539p4720584.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[GitHub] activemq pull request #222: [AMQ-6544] Create spring.schemas with schemas of...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/222 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Can I assign myself to jira issues?

Many thanks. That worked fine. Christian On 19.12.2016 14:01, Christopher Shannon wrote: I added you to the contributor role in Jira so you should be able to assign the Jira to yourself now. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: I am working on

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 (binding) Regards JB⁣​ On Dec 19, 2016, 14:02, at 14:02, Christopher Shannon wrote: >+1 > >On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Christian Schneider > wrote: >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Christian >> >> On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Christian > > On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.5, a new patch release that >> includes a couple high importance fixes. >> >>

Re: Can I assign myself to jira issues?

I added you to the contributor role in Jira so you should be able to assign the Jira to yourself now. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > I am working on some jira issues for ActiveMQ and create PRs for them. > Currently I can not assign myself

[GitHub] activemq pull request #222: [AMQ-6544] Create spring.schemas with schemas of...

GitHub user cschneider opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/222 [AMQ-6544] Create spring.schemas with schemas of activemq and spring As spring is embedded now we also need to define the spring schema mappings to make them available when being offline.

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #907: ARTEMIS-883 Fix OpenWire ProducerFlowControlTes...

Github user gaohoward commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/907 @clebertsuconic I've added the test for ttl and just fixed the Dont Response issue. I'll see if the tests all pass. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

Can I assign myself to jira issues?

I am working on some jira issues for ActiveMQ and create PRs for them. Currently I can not assign myself to the issues so they often remain unassigned even when resolved. In Aries there is a contributor role that can be given to non committers. Is this also possible in ActiveMQ. Can I get this

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.13.5

+1 (non binding) Christian On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.5, a new patch release that includes a couple high importance fixes. Release notes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12337971 Staging