Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
@clebertsuconic sure I'll take care of it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
@gaohoward actually, the example managmeent is broken after this. Can you
look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
@mtaylor I will let you merge this.. but this PR is +1 from me..
nice job @gaohoward
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1209
@jbertram Hi Justin can you review this pls?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1216
Merged now you can close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1216
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1218
Artemis 1125 - Implement JMS Bindings JDBC Store
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-artemis
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1217
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1216
@graben Thanks! Fixed in the 2.x fix too! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1217
@mtaylor I can change it now :) I've just arrived home :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1217
yes please. Thanks Franz
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1217
@franz1981 two comments here.
1. The network time out should also be used on the page store.
2. The default timeout is 20seconds but the docs says 30s.
I'll merge this
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
There might be a problem with Jenkins machine, the failure relates to
'memory allocation'. Not related to my PR.
@clebertsuconic I ran the whole test suite on my local machine, there
Github user graben commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1216
Well, 20s in impl is different to 30s in doc. :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1217
ARTEMIS-1124 JDBC Network Timeout configuration
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/franz1981/activemq-artemis
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1216
ARTEMIS-1124 JDBC Network Timeout configuration
(cherry picked from commit 256773206b75e6040d15cf06722843a7a9107ca8)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
Please. While the whole testsuite ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
OK, I removed the garbage files and reverted AmqpSendReceiveTest.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gaohoward commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215#discussion_r112476953
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpSendReceiveTest.java
---
@@ -53,38
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215#discussion_r112475520
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpSendReceiveTest.java
---
@@ -53,38
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
guys please hold on this commit, I found some garbage files need to remove.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
@clebertsuconic @mtaylor This is a resubmit of FQQN PR, with all tests
fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215
ARTEMIS-1093 Full qualified queue name support
Broker should support full qualified queue names (FQQN)
as well as bare queue names. This means when clients access
to a queue
23 matches
Mail list logo
