There is the purge when no consumers options.. I don't remember
exactly where now.. I can check later if you can't find it..
just giving the information real fast now. if you can't find it let me
know and I will look for you once I get back to a computer.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:43 PM,
you say "You can SET a destination to be deleted when no consumers are
attached" how do i set that, is there a config change for that? or did i
misinterpret you?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-delete-inactive-destinations-tp4728541p4728561.html
There is no Garbage Collection for destinations in Artemis currently..
You can set a destination to be deleted when no consumers are
attached.. and have it self created... but we don't have a GC for that
yet...
It would be a nice addition... I believe I have seen a JIRA around GC
for
I have a consumer running and listening to aes.q.#,
Messages sent to aes.q.1 , aes.q.2 are consumed by consumer but not
acknowledged. Message still remains in queue.
But if i listen to those specific queues aes.q.1, then message is received
and acknowledged.
any one using wild card on the
Saem question..watching...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-delete-inactive-destinations-tp4728541p4728558.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1400
Actually, you could add this to the core element instead. That means it
would work for the 1.x way of defining queues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1400
@michaelandrepearce Thanks for this.
Any chance you could make the queue ID unique.
e.g.
```xml
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/b1ad8f3adf51fa96069e1eccd7b87e9dff85223d#commitcomment-23094499
@jbertram Is there any reason you chose to hard code the changes in the
CORE client vs just using the prefix options?
GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1401
ARTEMIS-1290 QueueQuery add prefix on address
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-1290
GitHub user michaelandrepearce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1400
ARTEMIS-128 fix - Unable to configure queues containing "/" in broker.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
10 matches
Mail list logo
