Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@franz1981 we can have it back.. just would need to have it properly at
Netty exposed.. either have your class, a super class we can easily extend.. or
whatever is needed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@franz1981 i agree with you, any chance we can get netty guys, to either
take your class, or to get netty to make the methods you use in
UnsafeByteBufUtil set to public? So we
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@clebertsuconic @michaelandrepearce the reason behind that class was to
have more stable latencies on hot paths with no data-sync enabled: if not
reused it creates a big amount of
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@michaelandrepearce I think the right thing is to use the Netty Buffer Like
I am doing now... reusing the instance.. just to call wrap.. not even Netty
guys mind about that...
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@clebertsuconic just for record, i don't have issue with the class
@franz1981 made, its more the very recent change that brought in the
UnsafeByteBufUtil.java just so they
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@clebertsuconic yup lets, step me through the process, good chance to learn.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@michaelandrepearce fancy doing your first merge?
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@michaelandrepearce this is following up after #1561
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
@michaelandrepearce / @franz1981 I don't really see much gain on saving
the ByteBuf instance. Maybe page.write would create a few more instances.. but
I doubt it would really
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1567
ARTEMIS-1397 Removing Netty Copied classes
instead of duplicating a buffer from Netty, this will use an existing
Wrapped Unpooled Buffer
Which will in turn use Unsafe
Github user ryeats commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565
If you add ?protocols=CORE to the artemis.xml rebuild and then run
ArtemisFeatureTest it will fail because artemis doesn't start. Since I added
that in this PR it will be tested going
Github user ryeats commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565#discussion_r142204873
--- Diff: artemis-features/src/main/resources/artemis.xml ---
@@ -22,28 +22,68 @@ under the License.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1566
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565
I believe this is fixing something.. but I need to how reproduce it
exactly.. maybe add a test case...
I will hold merging this until you provide me some details.
---
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1566
NO-JIRA fix groupID URL doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively
Oops, forgot to include Robbie, the updated list is:
Binding:
+1 Timothy Bish
+1 Christopher Shannon
+1 Clebert Suconic
Non-Binding
+1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Robbie Gemmell
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Results of the Apache
On 2 October 2017 at 15:34, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
> Results of the Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.1 vote:
>
> Vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes.
>
> The following votes were received:
>
> Binding:
> +1 Timothy Bish
> +1 Christopher Shannon
> +1 Clebert Suconic
>
>
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.1 vote:
Vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes.
The following votes were received:
Binding:
+1 Timothy Bish
+1 Christopher Shannon
+1 Clebert Suconic
Non-Binding
+1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I'll start pushing out the release bundles and update the Wiki.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565
How to reproduce the issue?
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1565#discussion_r142150629
--- Diff: artemis-features/src/main/resources/artemis.xml ---
@@ -22,28 +22,68 @@ under the License.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1561
@ryeats thanks a lot!
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1561
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1561
@michaelandrepearce It's not copying... @franz1981 had written a class
extending a Netty Buffer, instead of using protected methods he named the
package io.netty... I missed that
Great job and well deserved Michael
Il giorno lun 2 ott 2017 alle ore 15:37 Clebert Suconic <
clebert.suco...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On behalf of the Apache ActiveMQ PMC, I am very pleased to announce
> that Michael Andre Pearce has accepted an invitation to become a
> committer. We
Nice work, Michael. Looking forward to future contributions!
Justin
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache ActiveMQ PMC, I am very pleased to announce
> that Michael Andre Pearce has accepted an invitation to become a
>
On behalf of the Apache ActiveMQ PMC, I am very pleased to announce
that Michael Andre Pearce has accepted an invitation to become a
committer. We greatly appreciate all of Michael's hard work and
generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continue
working with him.
Welcome
28 matches
Mail list logo