GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1649
ARTEMIS-1507 ActiveMQConnectionTimedOutException is thrown even though no
timeout expired
When the execution of code jumps out of the while cycle,
it should check whether the
GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1648
ARTEMIS-1506 Synchronization issue during failover in ClientSessionImpl
The temporary deadlock is avoided by removing 'synchronized' from
ClientSessionImpl::getCredits method. As
Hi Team,
I am getting the following error while try to establish ActiveMQ session
after creating successful connection.
*“Unable to write data to the transport connection: An existing connection
was forcibly closed by the remote host” *
I am using Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ dll for connecting to
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1647
ARTEMIS-1365 Advisory consumers listed in Console
Openwire clients create consumers to advisory topics to receive
notifications. As a result there are internal queues created
on
I believe we have now passed both getting 3x +1 pmc votes and 72hours have
passed. I’ll re-activate with just pmc added to it as admins
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Nov 2017, at 15:24, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> so, do we have consensus now? can we reactivate it?
>
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1646
NO-JIRA update release documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1600
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1645
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1645
ARTEMIS-1504 Update to QpidJMS 0.27.0 and Proton-j 0.23.0
Update to latest Qpid-JMS and match its Proton-J dependency
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642
I will get your title from the PR.. and add to the commit... I can do that
by check out a branch, amend and than push it.
the more info the better :)
---
Github user pgfox commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642#discussion_r149118258
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/large-message/src/main/resources/jndi.properties ---
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
# under the License.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642#discussion_r149117663
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/large-message/src/main/resources/jndi.properties ---
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
# under the License.
Github user pgfox commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642#discussion_r149115107
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/large-message/src/main/resources/jndi.properties ---
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
# under the License.
so, do we have consensus now? can we reactivate it?
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think lazy concensus is ok. As long as no one has
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1642#discussion_r149106833
--- Diff:
examples/features/standard/large-message/src/main/resources/jndi.properties ---
@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@
# under the License.
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0 release vote.
Vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes.
The following votes were received:
Binding:
+1 Timothy Bish
+1 Clebert Suconic
+1 Christopher Shannon
Non Binding:
+1 Justin Bertram
+1 Michael André Pearce
Thank you to everyone who contributed
+1
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Michael André Pearce <
michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Have performed some standard load and latency tests on physical servers,
> no negative regressions seen in gathered metrics.
>
> Also performed some basic failover cases in ha setup.
>
> Have
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
@RaiSaurabh Awesome. Thanks.
---
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
@mtaylor Ok. Thanks, I will start working on doing it in broker end. Will
update once done.
---
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
@RaiSaurabh I am not sure how it can work with paging. Since the full list
needs to be sorted before the pages are populated. This solution will receive
the first N (page size) unsorted
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
@mtaylor @michaelandrepearce The current implementation we set the sort
column and option in the filter and pass it along to the Artemis server for the
operation. But looking at the
GitHub user stanlyDoge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1644
ARTEMIS-1503 Added ng-grid plugin
The ng-grid needs the following plugin to automatically resize a table to
accomodate a varying number of rows.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
@RaiSaurabh @michaelandrepearce Since the results are paged, we need to
sort on the broker side. If it doesn't work already then that's a bug on the
broker that needs addressing.
---
24 matches
Mail list logo