Artemis 2.6.3 do not have data tool options like exp/encode/decode ...only
print option available running from bin directory
could you help ?
>artemis help data
NAME
artemis data - data tools group (print) (example ./artemis data
print)
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454952955
@clebertsuconic sorted,
just added ability in QueueConsumers to repeat (new repeatable iterator),
and then if
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454952955
@clebertsuconic sorted,
just added ability in consumers to repeat (new repeatable iterator), and
then if group, we
asfgit closed pull request #2482: ARTEMIS-2214 Cache durable in
PagedReference
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2482
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2482: ARTEMIS-2214 Cache
durable in PagedReference
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2482#issuecomment-454946530
...merging
This is an automated message from the Apache
asfgit closed pull request #2496: ENTMQBR-2178 add Implementation-Version for
bundle packaging
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2496
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454895122
@qihongxu thanks! I need to put a couple of logs on the code to check how is
the behaviour with several consumers
franz1981 commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454895122
@qihongxu thanks! I need to put a couple do logs to check how is th
behaviour with several consumers and check if live
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454874083
Sorted locally just extracting repeatble iterator logic as franz is keen on
this
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454854944
@clebertsuconic ok so i know whats going on, another feature i have
implemented for 2.7.0 reset of message groups,
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454854944
@clebertsuconic ok so i know whats going on, another feature i have
implemented for 2.7.0 reset of message groups,
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454854944
@clebertsuconic ok so i know whats going on, another feature i have
implemented for 2.7.0 reset of message groups,
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454854944
@clebertsuconic ok so i know whats going on, another feature i have
implemented for 2.7.0 reset of message groups, the test
michaelandrepearce edited a comment on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement
Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454842100
Ill have a look, i know that one was working as i had run those and exlusive
test when i first pr'd i assume i broke
michaelandrepearce commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer
Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454842100
Ill have a look
This is an automated message from the
I had tried before Christmas but had to postpone due to test failures.
Since it's clear enough we ned it and overdue, I want to cut a
release tomorrow, Jan -17th.
If anyone wants to add more fixes we can make another cut soon. 2.6.x
is only bug fixes so we should to cut release as often as
clebertsuconic commented on issue #2490: ARTEMIS-196 Implement Consumer Priority
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#issuecomment-454811544
one test failure at least: JMSMessageGroupsTest
The testsuite didn't complete.. but that one is failing for sure.
qihongxu edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>
qihongxu edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>
qihongxu edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>
qihongxu edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>
qihongxu edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>
qihongxu commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454780254
@franz1981
> 1. the tps are dependent by the most demanding operation in the CPU
flamegraph you've posted
>ie
gaohoward opened a new pull request #2500: NO-JIRA Adding test to verify
Openwire consuming from FQQN
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2500
The test verifies that a Openwire queue consumer can consume
from pre-configured multicast queues using FQQN.
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
franz1981 edited a comment on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
franz1981 commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454709952
@qihongxu
What is worrying me is this
> at most time it obtained a 3k~6k tps
If the same test (same
qihongxu commented on issue #2494: ARTEMIS-2224 Reduce contention on
LivePageCacheImpl
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2494#issuecomment-454686710
> 900M of page size and very small messages are not such a common use case
TBH
Agreed. Use this case just to make
28 matches
Mail list logo
