Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-10 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt present as the typical output of working remotely with repository URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous removal. On Thu, 10 Dec 2020

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today. It’s now OK. Regards JB > Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell a écrit : > > The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files > again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote > operation instead, it

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-10 Thread Robbie Gemmell
The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too given you dont need to resend the data. Example later. The mail also shows you just removed

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening). Regards JB > Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell a écrit : > > The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on > central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been > copied to the dist release

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

2020-12-10 Thread Robbie Gemmell
The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring. On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > This vote passed with