Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

2022-07-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release > > There are two features added as part of this release: > > - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we > don't have any

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
sure thing! On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:45 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > To be clear, the documentation already exists [1]. It just needs to be > updated with the aforementioned details when the uber jars are removed. > > > Justin > > [1] > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentatio

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Justin Bertram
To be clear, the documentation already exists [1]. It just needs to be updated with the aforementioned details when the uber jars are removed. Justin [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/client-classpath.html On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:39 PM Clebert Suconic wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
sure, of course we need to update the docs in relation to anything these removed jars. What I meant was we need to document the jars that are required independently of removing the jars.. if someone wants to use the client jars the client dependency should be documented anyway. that's what I meant

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Justin Bertram
I'm not sure what you mean by "independent issue." If we remove the uber jars then the docs have to be updated. The two things are directly related, right? Justin On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:13 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > I think that’s an independent issue. The doc would need to be updated > a

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
I think that’s an independent issue. The doc would need to be updated anyways. On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:40 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > Yes, the documentation needs to be clear. This is a usability issue. > > Even if you did a "mvn dependency:list" you'd get a list including optional > and test

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

2022-07-26 Thread Francesco Nigro
Well done 👍 +1 binding The page cache change/removal is a great improvement to the user experience!! Il mar 26 lug 2022, 20:31 Clebert Suconic ha scritto: > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release > > There are two features added as part of this release: > > - Paging

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Justin Bertram
Yes, the documentation needs to be clear. This is a usability issue. Even if you did a "mvn dependency:list" you'd get a list including optional and test dependencies. Also, there would be potentially unnecessary dependencies (e.g. netty-transport-native-kqueue even if you aren't on a Mac). Just

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release There are two features added as part of this release: - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we don't have any caching now.. we just read from files straight to Queues - Mirror now supports encryption of p

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
Even then, I would rather add a section with documentation than an Uber jar that's not tested. On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:22 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > the pom on artemis-core-client, artemis-jms-client, and > artemis-jakarta-client... They will include all the needed > dependencies, right? > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
the pom on artemis-core-client, artemis-jms-client, and artemis-jakarta-client... They will include all the needed dependencies, right? what is the issue? to have a clear text on the docs? On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:01 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > The original impetus for the uber jar was ARTEMI

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Justin Bertram
The original impetus for the uber jar was ARTEMIS-1129. The issue there was that it wasn't clear what jars were needed on the client. If we remove the uber jars then we need to update the documentation to make crystal clear what jars are needed on the client, including details about what jars may b

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Arthur Naseef
+1 for eliminating shaded jars/bundles where possible On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:16 AM Timothy Bish wrote: > +1 > > Removing them seems valid given the issues noted. > > On 7/26/22 12:18, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you > noted below.

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Timothy Bish
+1 Removing them seems valid given the issues noted. On 7/26/22 12:18, Robbie Gemmell wrote: I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you noted below. On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 14:34, Clebert Suconic wrote: We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveM

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you noted below. On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 14:34, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveMQ Artemis. > > artemis-jms-client-all > artemis-core-client-all > artemis-jakarta-client-all >

[DISCUSS] Remove shaded client JARS

2022-07-26 Thread Clebert Suconic
We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveMQ Artemis. artemis-jms-client-all artemis-core-client-all artemis-jakarta-client-all We are in the process of removing jboss-logging, and replacing it by SLF4j /LOG4J on a separate branch, and we will probably make a switch on the b