+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
>
> There are two features added as part of this release:
>
> - Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we
> don't have any
sure thing!
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:45 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> To be clear, the documentation already exists [1]. It just needs to be
> updated with the aforementioned details when the uber jars are removed.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1]
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentatio
To be clear, the documentation already exists [1]. It just needs to be
updated with the aforementioned details when the uber jars are removed.
Justin
[1]
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/client-classpath.html
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:39 PM Clebert Suconic
wr
sure, of course we need to update the docs in relation to anything
these removed jars. What I meant was we need to document the jars that
are required independently of removing the jars.. if someone wants to
use the client jars the client dependency should be documented anyway.
that's what I meant
I'm not sure what you mean by "independent issue." If we remove the uber
jars then the docs have to be updated. The two things are directly related,
right?
Justin
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:13 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I think that’s an independent issue. The doc would need to be updated
> a
I think that’s an independent issue. The doc would need to be updated
anyways.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:40 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> Yes, the documentation needs to be clear. This is a usability issue.
>
> Even if you did a "mvn dependency:list" you'd get a list including optional
> and test
Well done 👍
+1 binding
The page cache change/removal is a great improvement to the user
experience!!
Il mar 26 lug 2022, 20:31 Clebert Suconic ha
scritto:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
>
> There are two features added as part of this release:
>
> - Paging
Yes, the documentation needs to be clear. This is a usability issue.
Even if you did a "mvn dependency:list" you'd get a list including optional
and test dependencies. Also, there would be potentially unnecessary
dependencies (e.g. netty-transport-native-kqueue even if you aren't on a
Mac).
Just
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0 release
There are two features added as part of this release:
- Paging does not use soft cache any longer. As a matter of fact we
don't have any caching now.. we just read from files straight to
Queues
- Mirror now supports encryption of p
Even then, I would rather add a section with documentation than an
Uber jar that's not tested.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:22 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> the pom on artemis-core-client, artemis-jms-client, and
> artemis-jakarta-client... They will include all the needed
> dependencies, right?
>
>
the pom on artemis-core-client, artemis-jms-client, and
artemis-jakarta-client... They will include all the needed
dependencies, right?
what is the issue? to have a clear text on the docs?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 2:01 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> The original impetus for the uber jar was ARTEMI
The original impetus for the uber jar was ARTEMIS-1129. The issue there was
that it wasn't clear what jars were needed on the client. If we remove the
uber jars then we need to update the documentation to make crystal clear
what jars are needed on the client, including details about what jars may
b
+1 for eliminating shaded jars/bundles where possible
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:16 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
> +1
>
> Removing them seems valid given the issues noted.
>
> On 7/26/22 12:18, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you
> noted below.
+1
Removing them seems valid given the issues noted.
On 7/26/22 12:18, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you noted below.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 14:34, Clebert Suconic wrote:
We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveM
I think removing them would be good for various reasons inc all you noted below.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 14:34, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveMQ Artemis.
>
> artemis-jms-client-all
> artemis-core-client-all
> artemis-jakarta-client-all
>
We currently deploy these following shaded uber jars with ActiveMQ Artemis.
artemis-jms-client-all
artemis-core-client-all
artemis-jakarta-client-all
We are in the process of removing jboss-logging, and replacing it by
SLF4j /LOG4J on a separate branch, and we will probably make a switch
on the b
16 matches
Mail list logo