Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release

2020-06-24 Thread Michael Pearce
HI JB Whilst this is cancelled, as per your heads up, you mentioned JMS 2.0 in the 5.16.0 release, but i cannot find any JIRA tickets in the release notes on this. As obviously to support that on openwire (due to extra features), Can you point us to the corresponding changes in

Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote pluggable implementation

2020-04-14 Thread Michael Pearce
"I was talking about the implementation indeed" In that case disregard my email :) this then should be invisible to current / end users. On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 07:33, nigro_franz wrote: > @clebert > > > I think configuration and implementation are orthogonal here. > Totally agree! > > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote pluggable implementation

2020-04-11 Thread Michael Pearce
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 4:39 PM Michael Pearce > wrote: > > > (Try again using my other mail account so formatting of my mail doesnt > muck > > up) > > > > > > I would be against us bringing in something that makes a nasty barrier > for

Re: [DISCUSSION] New Quorum vote pluggable implementation

2020-04-11 Thread Michael Pearce
(Try again using my other mail account so formatting of my mail doesnt muck up) I would be against us bringing in something that makes a nasty barrier for entry for existing users. Think about the current situation with classic and artemis where one of the biggest issues has been that a user

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-10 Thread Michael Pearce
Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:05 AM Michael Pearce > wrote: > > > I assume this is issue in my local environment. > > > > The fact that others have confirmed they can build and run tests (note i > > could compile but issue was tests not passing) > > > > I

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-10 Thread Michael Pearce
I assume this is issue in my local environment. The fact that others have confirmed they can build and run tests (note i could compile but issue was tests not passing) I will try to clear down completely and re install everything. On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, 22:15 Krzysztof, wrote: > I was also

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-08 Thread Michael Pearce
Just to add Dominico, in my RHEL linux environment which is also at maven 3 and java 8, i dont get such issues. On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 16:00, Michael Pearce wrote: > Hi Domenico > > > Last release it failed somewhere else, but just took current master and > re-checked it, seem

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-08 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi Domenico Last release it failed somewhere else, but just took current master and re-checked it, seems its currently failing at this point on windows, this is doing just a normal build, not even the larger release build with all tests. Windows 10 RedHat\java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.212-3 Maven

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-08 Thread Michael Pearce
es those failures. > > > > > > On 4/7/20 7:22 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > > > I asked Justin, and he will try for it... if it's just a day or two > > > > delay we should probably wait. if it delays any further that's what I > > > > meant for ano

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.12 release on April 13th and May 4th

2020-04-07 Thread Michael Pearce
Is it worth getting the queue config refactor in before this release? That Justin has worked on. That way we can have a release with the refactor and then the test cases could be refactored for the following release. On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, 17:57 Clebert Suconic, wrote: > I am planning a

Re: Time to assemble the latest Board Report

2020-04-04 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi Bruce, Thanks, have added updates in the NMS area. I havent been so active in Artemis this quarter, so will leave someone else to fill that out. Best Mike On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 17:55, Bruce Snyder wrote: > I hope everyone is safely with your family during these challenging times > and

NO-JIRA

2020-04-04 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi all, A small polite ask, in recent it seems we have been committing more and more using no-jira, in the activemq artemis broker. Can i ask we revert back to being a little better controlled, with creating and committing jira's so changes and bug fixes are clear in release. No-jira really

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.1-rc1

2020-04-04 Thread Michael Pearce
Thanks Krzysztof for running this release. And congrats on doing your first. I have added your Signature Key and as well as copying over the artefacts to the release dist. I will let you carry on with the rest of the release process, e.g. send a PR to the website to update the links, and then

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-11-06 Thread Michael Pearce
*Michael* On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:58, Martyn Taylor wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:18 PM Michael Pearce > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now > > resolved. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-11-06 Thread Michael Pearce
; > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +, "Krzys

[VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2

2019-10-31 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved. I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client.. Also includes some

[VOTE[ Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0

2019-10-03 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, I have put together a spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client.. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to make the release, updating for latest visual

New Travis Build

2019-07-16 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All / PMC, As part of updating NMS components, particularly NMS AMQP one, we are wanting to add some CI going forwards, it seems logging into travis i dont have permissions to setup a new build direct, how do we go about this? As obviously we have Artemis using Travis. Any insight

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 6

2019-07-01 Thread Michael Pearce
I fogot to mention all votes received for Apache NMS 1.8.0 Relese Cadidate 6 were +1. Just for records. On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Michael Pearce wrote: > Hi All, > > Vote for RC6 passed with 9 votes, 3 binding and 6 non binding. > > Binding: > * Michael Pearce > * Clebe

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 6

2019-07-01 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, Vote for RC6 passed with 9 votes, 3 binding and 6 non binding. Binding: * Michael Pearce * Clebert Suconic * Martyn Taylor Non-Binding: * Krzysztof Porebski * Derek Heiser * Chris Morgan * Ragnar Paulson * Duane Pauls * Francesco Nigro Thank you everyone who contributed to review

Re: Improve paging performance when there are lots of subscribers

2019-06-27 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi First of all i think this is an excellent effort, and could be a potential massive positive change. Before making any change on such scale, i do think we need to ensure we have sufficient benchmarks on a number of scenarios, not just one use case, and the benchmark tool used does need to be

[VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 6

2019-06-26 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, I have put together another re-spin rc6 correcting sha's based on Tim's feedback, for an Apache NMS API release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively updates the project to support .net standard 2.0. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was

Re: [VOTE][CANCELLED] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 5

2019-06-26 Thread Michael Pearce
884772 1.8.0-rc5/Apache.NMS-1.8.0-bin.zip > > The non-existent directory name means the sums can't be checked using > the standard 'shasum -c *.sha512' etc methods > > Also the public key for the person signing the release artifact doesn't > appear to have been added to the KEYS fi

Re: How to access slack?

2019-06-26 Thread Michael Pearce
Ive just sent you an invite. For others future reference Slack it works a diff than IRC unless you have apache.org email, it seems to been setup by the ASF as invitation only, you just need to ask on dev or user mail-list for access, and then someone will be able to invite via email within slack.

[VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 5

2019-06-26 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, I have put together another re-spin rc5 after further feedback on rc4, for a Apache NMS API release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively updates the project to support .net standard 2.0. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to make

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 4

2019-06-25 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, Sorry for the earlier false start. I have put together a re-spin after rc1 feedback for a Apache NMS API release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively updates the project to support .net standard 2.0. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 2 [Cancelled]

2019-06-25 Thread Michael Pearce
I just spotted something, i made a mistake, i will have to make another. On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 12:18, Michael Pearce wrote: > Hi All, > > I have put together a re-spin after rc1 feedback for a Apache NMS API > release, please > check it and vote accordingly. > > Thi

[VOTE] Release Apache NMS 1.8.0 - Release Candidate 2

2019-06-25 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, I have put together a re-spin after rc1 feedback for a Apache NMS API release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively updates the project to support .net standard 2.0. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to make the release, updating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS API 1.8.0

2019-06-24 Thread Michael Pearce
too > many respins. > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:08 PM +0100, "Timothy Bish" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS API 1.8.0

2019-06-24 Thread Michael Pearce
You can still vote, just it wont be binding. We encourage everyone to vote. On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 16:58, Heiser, Derek wrote: > I can't vote, but just wanted so say thanks for putting the effort into > getting this update done! > > ~D > > -Original Message----- >

[VOTE] Release Apache NMS API 1.8.0

2019-06-24 Thread Michael Pearce
Hi All, I have put together a spin for a Apache NMS API release, please check it and vote accordingly. This release effectively updates the project to support .net standard 2.0. Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to make the release, updating for latest visual